Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50143

in Leighton, IowaPopulation 538

54.36/ 100

Ranked #10,247 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #307 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Radon

3.5 pCi/L

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.56%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.3%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST20th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.5%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST44th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

93.7%

in the top 10.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Leighton, Iowa (ZIP 50143), in overall standing, comes out in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,247th) and the top 33% of Iowa (307th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: poverty rests in the bottom 4.9% nationally, and modeled pfas settles in the bottom 7.4% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Homeownership rests in the top 10.6% nationally, and housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 11.8% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 12.3% nationally, and transportation rests in the bottom 12.4% nationally. On the other hand, modeled radon settles in the top 4.7% nationally, and binge drinking lands in the top 8.3% nationally. Fiber broadband rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, for reference, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 50207, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 70%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%26.9–33.8
High blood pressure among adults38.1%33.9–42.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.6
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.8–8.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.4–8.4
Depression among adults19.6%16.7–22.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.0%33.6–42.2
Obesity among adults38.0%30.6–45.1
Stroke among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.1%8.0–12.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%5.0–7.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.4%77.5–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%74.7–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.4–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.8%62.9–72.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.0%67.6–74.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%71.2–84.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.5%16.2–22.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%13.3–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.8%22.6–31.3
Short sleep duration among adults32.9%26.7–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.5%15.1–20.2
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.4–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.7–14.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.9–14.1
Any disability among adults28.4%24.6–32.3
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.6
Independent living disability among adults6.9%6.1–7.8
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.7–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.5–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%19.6–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.5–11.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.0–9.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.3–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.6–6.2
Loneliness among adults30.1%25.4–34.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.4–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–640.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)0.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription91.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate93.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population2.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households43.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+10.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age40.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$86,023$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$314,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$770$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured