Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48729

in Deford, MichiganPopulation 1,555

47.83/ 100

Ranked #19,148 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #643 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

37.9%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.2 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

18.3 mi

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

76.8%

in the bottom 12.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

92.8%

in the top 12.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

Deford, Michigan (ZIP 48729), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 40% nationally (19,148th) and the bottom 34% of Michigan (643rd).

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: floodplain exposure settles in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband lies in the top 12.8% nationally, modeled colon screening rests in the top 13.7% nationally, and modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 17% nationally. On the other side, modeled arsenic is in the top 1.9% nationally, walkability lands in the bottom 8.9% nationally, and distance to a community health center stands in the top 9.3% nationally. Home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 12.0% nationally. Recreation settles at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 48726, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 20%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.0%29.2–36.7
High blood pressure among adults38.3%33.8–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.1–11.1
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.4–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.0–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%8.6–11.6
Depression among adults28.0%23.9–32.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%10.9–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%33.4–42.6
Obesity among adults41.1%32.8–49.7
Stroke among adults4.0%3.5–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.5%10.1–15.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.4–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.5%75.3–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.1–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%84.9–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.3%66.6–76.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.1%65.7–72.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%70.1–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.3–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%14.3–20.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.5%21.8–31.7
Short sleep duration among adults33.7%27.8–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.2%18.0–24.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%16.2–20.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.8%13.8–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%13.6–18.1
Any disability among adults33.9%29.2–39.0
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.5
Independent living disability among adults9.4%8.1–10.8
Mobility disability among adults15.9%13.6–18.4
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%19.3–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%11.7–17.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.9%11.3–16.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.8–12.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.6–9.0
Loneliness among adults31.9%26.8–37.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.6–9.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6413.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)10.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription76.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate87.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households60.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+14.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age44.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$60,776$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$211,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$612$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.2 yr ± 0.7678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.76 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured