Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48456

in Minden City, MichiganPopulation 788

47.69/ 100

Ranked #19,332 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #650 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 10.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.27%

in the bottom 11.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

11.8%

in the bottom 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US13th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

46.7 mi

in the top 14.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

14.7%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Minden City, Michigan (ZIP 48456) lands in the bottom 40% nationally (19,332nd) and the bottom 33% of Michigan (650th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise lies in the bottom 11.7% nationally, short sleep lands in the bottom 13.0% nationally, and humid heat sits in the bottom 13.3% nationally. Modeled pfas is in the bottom 13.5% nationally, distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 14.1% nationally, and modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 15% nationally. On the other side, walkability registers in the bottom 10.9% nationally, and modeled arsenic rests in the top 16% nationally.

A note on the terms: pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 48470, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 36%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.6%30.4–36.9
High blood pressure among adults40.1%36.2–43.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.6–11.4
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.3–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.8–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%9.1–11.7
Depression among adults27.8%24.3–31.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.7–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%34.4–42.2
Obesity among adults39.4%32.2–46.7
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.7%12.3–17.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.0%5.8–8.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.9–81.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.3–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.2%85.6–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.0%63.7–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.8%65.7–72.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.8%69.1–82.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.2–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.6%15.3–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.5%25.1–34.3
Short sleep duration among adults30.7%25.5–36.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.3%18.7–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.3–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.1–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%13.9–17.5
Any disability among adults35.7%31.6–40.2
Hearing disability among adults9.4%8.5–10.5
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Mobility disability among adults16.7%14.6–19.1
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%19.4–26.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.3–17.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.0–16.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.9–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Loneliness among adults32.1%27.4–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.7–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–644.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)10.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle6.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription80.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate84.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households62.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+16.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age45.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$62,321$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$195,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$866$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.5 yr ± 0.9978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.99 years of 80.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured