Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48445

in Kinde, MichiganPopulation 1,162

47.45/ 100

Ranked #19,612 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #665 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

34.9%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

Kinde, Michigan (ZIP 48445), overall, ranks in the bottom 39% nationally (19,612th) and the bottom 32% of Michigan (665th).

continue reading

This area's pressures are easy to read across the measures: modeled arsenic resides in the top 2.3% nationally, walkability settles in the bottom 9.1% nationally, and home broadband subscription is in the bottom 16% nationally. Recreation sits at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians lands at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. On the brighter side, modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat stands in the bottom 13.3% nationally, and disaster risk rests in the bottom 16% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure registers at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening resides in the top 17% nationally.

Defined simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 48467, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 84.2; chronic-disease standing 22.6 — 62 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,615 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.8%31.3–38.7
High blood pressure among adults40.5%36.3–45.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.0%10.0–12.1
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%8.0–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Depression among adults27.4%23.7–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.9–15.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.3%34.0–43.0
Obesity among adults38.8%31.0–47.6
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.0–16.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.6–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.3–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%77.4–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%85.7–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.7%65.9–75.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.3%66.9–73.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%67.3–81.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.5–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.3%15.0–19.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.5%24.1–33.6
Short sleep duration among adults32.4%26.2–39.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%18.9–24.7
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%16.0–20.1
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.5–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.5%13.8–17.6
Any disability among adults36.1%31.9–41.0
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.5–10.6
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.0
Mobility disability among adults17.4%15.2–19.8
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.9–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%19.7–26.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.3–17.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.0–16.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.8–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.7–8.8
Loneliness among adults32.2%27.3–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–645.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)12.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription79.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate81.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households68.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+22.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age49.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$51,645$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$121,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$740$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 0.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.75 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured