Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48730

in East Tawas, MichiganPopulation 4,584

49.86/ 100

Ranked #16,437 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #506 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

35%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.23 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.9 per million

in the bottom 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST17th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.2%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.3%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST82nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

13 days/year

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

11.6%

in the top 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.45 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

42.3%

in the top 14.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

14.6%

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US74th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, East Tawas, Michigan (ZIP 48730) sits in the bottom 49% nationally (16,437th) and the bottom 48% of Michigan (506th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: park land rests in the top 3.9% nationally, elder services sits in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk registers in the bottom 8.0% nationally. Modeled colon screening lands in the top 6.5% nationally, modeled humid heat resides in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and childcare lies in the top 13.2% nationally. Working the other way, modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 8.3% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle is in the top 11.5% nationally, and modeled hearing disability rests in the top 11.8% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 48742, about 16 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 84%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 76%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 84.1; chronic-disease standing 11.5 — 73 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #911 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.7%34.5–42.6
High blood pressure among adults44.9%40.1–49.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults13.1%11.9–14.4
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.2–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults10.2%9.0–11.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.5%10.0–13.0
Depression among adults26.4%22.5–30.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.9%12.8–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.3%37.4–46.9
Obesity among adults37.0%28.9–45.1
Stroke among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.7%9.4–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.3%5.2–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.9%80.0–85.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.5%80.4–86.2
Cholesterol screening among adults90.2%88.8–91.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.3%68.7–77.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.3%65.8–72.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.2%68.4–82.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%10.6–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%13.5–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.4%23.5–33.4
Short sleep duration among adults31.1%25.1–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.0%18.9–25.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.3–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults17.0%14.9–19.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.6–16.2
Any disability among adults36.9%32.2–41.7
Hearing disability among adults10.7%9.4–11.9
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
Mobility disability among adults19.4%16.7–22.1
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.6%17.3–24.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.0–15.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.1%10.9–15.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.7–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.0%6.0–8.0
Loneliness among adults29.7%24.7–34.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.9–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–646.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle11.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription84.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate75.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population2.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households63.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+32.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age56.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$49,823$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$157,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$628$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured