Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

04047

in Parsonsfield, MainePopulation 1,715

47.25/ 100

Ranked #19,864 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranked #227 of 408 Maine ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranked #78 of 82 Portland-South Portland, ME ZIPs (bottom 4.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

77.1%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.56 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST79th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.0%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST53rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 32% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US68th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Parsonsfield, Maine (ZIP 04047), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 38% nationally (19,864th) and the bottom 44% of Maine (227th).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled tree cover lands in the top 6.1% nationally, and childcare is in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Crowded housing rests at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies in the top 18% nationally. By contrast, fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled energy burden settles in the top 9.5% nationally, and distance to an emergency room registers in the top 16% nationally. Distance to a nursing home stands in the top 17% nationally. Recreation lands at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Defined in plain terms, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 03836, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Portland-South Portland, ME metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 72%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.4%31.5–37.0
High blood pressure among adults38.8%35.8–41.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.4
Current asthma among adults13.5%12.0–14.9
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%8.6–11.9
Depression among adults26.5%23.7–29.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.8–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.3%36.4–42.2
Obesity among adults36.1%31.9–40.4
Stroke among adults4.1%3.5–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.8%11.5–16.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.7%6.8–10.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%75.8–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%78.2–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.4%85.4–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.4%66.9–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.1%58.0–64.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.3%72.0–82.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.9–18.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.6%14.4–20.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.2%21.3–28.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.2%29.4–37.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.0%18.7–25.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.2–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.6–17.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.6%15.2–20.1
Any disability among adults35.6%31.6–39.5
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Independent living disability among adults8.9%7.6–10.3
Mobility disability among adults15.8%13.4–18.2
Self-care disability among adults4.3%3.6–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.3–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%20.2–26.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%9.6–14.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults16.2%13.1–19.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%8.9–12.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.1–9.8
Loneliness among adults31.2%27.7–34.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.9–9.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.3% (3.2–19.5%) n=416
Uninsured 18–6411.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2869.8% (3.0–20.9%) n=413
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.2% (0.8–11.7%) n=417
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.4% (14.9–57.3%) n=417
Unemployment rate (16+)2.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.1% (0.0–8.3%) n=415
Households without a vehicle4.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–11.5%) n=416
Broadband subscription94.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.9% (79.7–97.2%) n=416
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.4% (13.9–35.0%) n=416
Homeownership rate86.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.7% (68.7–95.5%) n=416
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.4%) n=416
Foreign-born population2.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.1% (0.1–5.9%) n=417
Single-parent households52.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08761.5% (48.8–80.6%) n=414
Population 65+18.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55324.6% (16.3–42.1%) n=417
Median age44.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29249.0 yr (39.3–60.7) n=413
Median household income$72,045$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,485 ($50,225–$100,018) n=396
Median home value$272,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$246,500 ($130,660–$484,830) n=402
Median gross rent$1,185$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,014 ($618–$1,501) n=320
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)ME median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 1.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.0 yr (76.1–82.5) n=363

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.70 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured