Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49111

in Eau Claire, MichiganPopulation 3,159

47.42/ 100

Ranked #19,648 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #666 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #17 of 23 Niles, MI ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

0.54%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

4.3%

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Eau Claire, Michigan (ZIP 49111) ranks in the bottom 39% nationally (19,648th) and the bottom 32% of Michigan (666th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center resides at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk registers in the bottom 11.6% nationally, and transportation noise rests in the bottom 16% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Recreation lies in the top 24% nationally, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the bottom 25% nationally. On the other side, crowded housing sits in the top 17% nationally. Childcare is at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 24% nationally.

To spell things out, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Close by, ZIP 49102, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Niles, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 28%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 83.1; chronic-disease standing 24.6 — 59 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,851 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.1%30.9–37.4
High blood pressure among adults40.2%36.5–44.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.6–11.5
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.6–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.8–9.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.1%8.8–11.4
Depression among adults26.7%23.4–30.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%12.3–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%33.9–41.7
Obesity among adults38.9%33.1–45.3
Stroke among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.6%12.3–17.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%6.8–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.4–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.9–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.1–89.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.2%65.2–73.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.7%62.7–68.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.0%69.0–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.5–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.2%13.6–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.4%24.2–32.7
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%32.3–42.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.1%19.3–25.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.6–19.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.4%14.4–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%13.7–17.4
Any disability among adults36.2%32.0–40.4
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.2–10.2
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.7–11.0
Mobility disability among adults17.3%15.1–19.6
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.2
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%18.9–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.9%13.5–18.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.3%12.9–17.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.1–13.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.3–9.4
Loneliness among adults31.4%26.8–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.6–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6411.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)7.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle6.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription82.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate82.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population2.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households64.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+27.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age50.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$70,915$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$176,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$761$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 1.3578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.35 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured