Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48422

in Croswell, MichiganPopulation 6,094

46.20/ 100

Ranked #21,118 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #738 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

29.9%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.1%

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

15.1 mi

in the top 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

Croswell, Michigan (ZIP 48422), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 34% nationally (21,118th) and the bottom 24% of Michigan (738th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: grocery rests in the top 10.1% nationally, and modeled humid heat sits in the bottom 17% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure registers at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled arsenic lands in the top 3.3% nationally, and energy burden resides in the top 8.3% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies in the top 12.1% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 15% nationally. Unemployment stands in the top 16% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Walkability rests in the bottom 19% nationally.

In everyday language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 48032, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 6%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.6%28.2–35.2
High blood pressure among adults38.2%33.9–42.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.6–10.4
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.6–10.9
Depression among adults27.8%24.0–31.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.0–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.1%32.8–41.4
Obesity among adults39.7%31.6–48.0
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.7%12.9–18.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.9%6.6–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%74.7–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.7–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.4–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.4%62.6–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.8%61.3–68.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.0%66.4–81.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.7%13.7–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.8%15.3–20.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.2%24.7–34.4
Short sleep duration among adults32.6%26.5–39.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.2%18.5–24.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.6–20.9
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%13.9–17.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.1%14.3–18.1
Any disability among adults35.0%30.6–39.7
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.5
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Mobility disability among adults15.8%13.8–18.0
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.7%20.1–27.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.4%12.9–18.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.2–16.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.7–13.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.0–9.3
Loneliness among adults32.9%27.6–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.1–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–647.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)11.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)7.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle6.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription88.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate86.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households66.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+19.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age44.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$57,899$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$171,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$691$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 0.9878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.98 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured