Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48435

in Fostoria, MichiganPopulation 2,547

47.49/ 100

Ranked #19,562 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #662 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #160 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

55.5%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

94.6%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.4%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

0.72%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Fostoria, Michigan (ZIP 48435) comes out in the bottom 39% nationally (19,562nd) and the bottom 32% of Michigan (662nd).

continue reading

The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: modeled arsenic resides in the top 0.5% nationally, and crowded housing rests in the top 9.6% nationally. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 18% nationally, and unemployment settles in the top 18% nationally. Physicians registers at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. More positively, homeownership stands in the top 9.1% nationally, and modeled disaster risk lands in the bottom 12.1% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure is at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle resides in the bottom 18% nationally.

In plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 48421, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%29.6–35.1
High blood pressure among adults37.7%34.5–41.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.0–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.8–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%7.0–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.7–10.7
Depression among adults27.7%24.8–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%11.0–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%33.7–40.3
Obesity among adults39.2%33.4–45.3
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.8%10.9–14.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.9–8.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%75.5–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%76.8–81.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.6–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.6%64.9–72.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.8%62.9–68.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%69.0–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.5–19.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.8%15.7–19.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.7%23.2–30.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.3%30.6–40.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.7%18.5–23.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%17.0–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%14.2–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.8%14.3–17.3
Any disability among adults33.5%30.1–37.0
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.5–9.0
Independent living disability among adults9.3%8.4–10.2
Mobility disability among adults15.5%13.9–17.3
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.7–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%20.5–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.5–16.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.9–15.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.6–12.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Loneliness among adults31.5%27.6–35.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.0%7.0–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6415.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)11.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)7.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription80.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate94.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households63.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+17.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age36.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$86,905$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$143,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,007$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 1.0178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured