Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49221

in Adrian, MichiganPopulation 41,087

46.20/ 100

Ranked #21,109 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #737 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

989 units

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.4 µg/L

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.9 pCi/L

in the top 12.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US88th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Adrian, Michigan (ZIP 49221) ranks in the bottom 34% nationally (21,109th) and the bottom 24% of Michigan (737th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 1.4% nationally, and lithium in drinking water registers in the bottom 2.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room sits at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers stands in the top 14.6% nationally, and outpatient settles in the top 15.0% nationally. Against that, modeled expected annual loss lies in the top 6.7% nationally, radon resides in the top 12.4% nationally, and disaster risk lands in the top 12.0% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 49229, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 80%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 14%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.5%25.5–31.6
High blood pressure among adults37.2%33.4–41.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.5
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%8.2–10.0
Depression among adults28.0%24.2–31.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.2–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.4%32.4–40.4
Obesity among adults41.9%35.0–48.7
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.3%11.8–17.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%8.1–10.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.8%73.0–78.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.7%74.1–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.4%82.6–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.5%62.0–71.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.0%59.7–66.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.6%72.1–84.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.3–19.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%14.6–19.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.6%24.7–33.0
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%32.3–43.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%20.0–25.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.4%17.4–21.7
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.9–17.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%15.3–18.9
Any disability among adults35.2%31.2–39.4
Hearing disability among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Independent living disability among adults10.0%9.1–11.1
Mobility disability among adults15.5%13.8–17.5
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.5–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.7%20.2–27.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.4%15.9–20.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.8%15.6–20.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.7–15.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.7–11.1
Loneliness among adults33.2%28.2–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.6–11.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–648.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)11.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle7.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription90.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate71.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population2.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households56.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+19.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age41.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$65,977$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$170,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$992$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.1 yr ± 0.5778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.57 years of 78.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured