Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48063

in Columbus, MichiganPopulation 4,206

57.26/ 100

Ranked #7,011 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #191 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #86 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

17.9%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

6.9%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

4.3%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

79.5%

in the top 14.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.4%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Columbus, Michigan (ZIP 48063) sits in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,011th) and the top 20% of Michigan (191st).

continue reading

What works most in this area's favor shows up clearly across the measures: modeled tooth loss resides in the bottom 7.8% nationally, modeled colon screening lies in the top 12.3% nationally, and poverty settles in the bottom 15% nationally. Modeled mammography stands in the top 14.2% nationally, and disaster risk is in the bottom 17% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. Modeled uninsured sits in the bottom 9.1% nationally, and vision disability registers in the bottom 13.5% nationally. Working the other way, modeled arsenic lands in the top 7.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 48047, about 6.1 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Disability

healthier than 64%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.9%25.7–32.4
High blood pressure among adults34.8%30.9–39.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.7
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.5–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%5.8–8.7
Depression among adults26.8%23.3–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.1%8.6–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%31.1–39.1
Obesity among adults33.6%27.6–40.8
Stroke among adults3.1%2.7–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.9%5.5–8.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%3.9–7.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%73.9–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.3%77.2–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%86.5–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.6%67.0–75.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.3%67.2–73.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.5%72.8–85.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.5–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%10.7–16.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.2%17.2–25.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.9%28.4–39.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.3%13.4–19.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%14.8–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.2–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.1–15.7
Any disability among adults29.2%24.6–34.3
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.9
Independent living disability among adults7.1%5.9–8.4
Mobility disability among adults12.1%9.9–14.5
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.5–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.1–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%18.7–26.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%7.7–13.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.3–11.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%6.8–10.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.9–7.1
Loneliness among adults32.9%27.9–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.9–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–642.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)6.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle4.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription88.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate87.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households53.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+14.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age40.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$93,844$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$323,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,430$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 1.3378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.33 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured