Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48205

in Detroit, MichiganPopulation 34,187

31.03/ 100

Ranked #30,543 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.8%)

Ranked #953 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 2.1%)

Ranked #201 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (bottom 6.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

51.7%

in the top 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

7.3%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

28.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

34.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.2%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.1%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

44.7%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

22.5%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.4%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

33.3%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 48205, one of several in Detroit, Michigan, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 4.8% nationally (30,543rd) and the bottom 2.1% of Michigan (953rd).

continue reading

Where this area is stretched, the data is unambiguous: modeled short sleep is in the top 0.10% nationally, energy burden rests in the top 1.0% nationally, and utility shutoff sits in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity registers in the top 0.4% nationally, self-care disability lands in the top 2.5% nationally, and independent living disability resides in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled food insecurity lies in the top 0.9% nationally, and transportation settles in the top 1.2% nationally. Modeled vision disability stands in the top 4.1% nationally, and fair or poor health is in the top 4.0% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 48089, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.08%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 1.0%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.2 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $38,966 predicts 76.4 years — 5.1 years below.

    Ranked #5,568 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.2 ± 1.2 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.4 years — 4.1 years below them.

    Ranked #3,070 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.9%26.8–31.0
High blood pressure among adults47.0%44.5–49.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
Current asthma among adults14.8%13.4–16.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.5–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.5%9.6–11.5
Depression among adults23.1%20.8–25.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.6%17.0–20.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.9%30.5–35.3
Obesity among adults47.8%44.1–51.5
Stroke among adults5.7%5.3–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.2%19.1–25.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.5%9.0–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.8%73.7–78.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.5%80.3–84.6
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%83.0–86.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.6%59.2–65.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.0%49.1–54.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%73.7–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.5%9.9–13.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.1%20.8–25.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.8%35.6–42.0
Short sleep duration among adults51.7%48.3–55.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.3%30.8–35.9
Frequent mental distress among adults24.1%22.1–26.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%16.2–19.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.2%18.4–22.1
Any disability among adults40.5%37.6–43.5
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.7
Independent living disability among adults15.1%13.8–16.4
Mobility disability among adults21.4%19.6–23.2
Self-care disability among adults8.2%7.6–8.8
Vision disability among adults10.4%9.6–11.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults35.2%31.9–38.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults44.7%41.3–48.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults48.7%45.4–52.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.8%31.8–37.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults22.5%20.5–24.6
Loneliness among adults38.5%35.1–42.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults28.7%26.2–31.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate33.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6414.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)14.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)19.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle18.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription86.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)43.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate50.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households24.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+11.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age32.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$38,966$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$65,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,215$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.2 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 71.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured