Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

48374

in Novi, MichiganPopulation 17,672

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

72.90/ 100

Ranked #176 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 0.6%)

Ranked #5 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 0.6%)

Ranked #5 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (top 2.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$182,827

in the top 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

7.3%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

8.8%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.5%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

4.5%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

3.1%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

0.6 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.5%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.4%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

25.7%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 48374, one of several in Novi, Michigan places in the top 0.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (176th) and the top 0.6% of Michigan (5th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: household income rests in the top 1.6% nationally, and modeled mobility disability resides in the bottom 2.2% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability is in the bottom 1.8% nationally, and transportation lands in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Modeled independent living disability stands in the bottom 1.0% nationally, modeled tooth loss registers in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and fatal road crashes settles in the bottom 4.1% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity sits in the bottom 4.4% nationally, hearing disability lies in the bottom 3.2% nationally, and obesity rests in the bottom 6.7% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Among the ZIPs nearby, none ranks healthier overall than this one. Further still, the area also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 98%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.7%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.5%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 1.0%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 98%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.7%17.8–21.6
High blood pressure among adults28.9%26.4–31.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.1%6.5–7.7
Current asthma among adults9.3%8.3–10.4
Coronary heart disease among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.9%3.4–4.6
Depression among adults18.3%16.2–20.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.5–9.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.3%30.6–35.9
Obesity among adults25.7%22.5–28.9
Stroke among adults2.1%1.9–2.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years3.1%2.5–3.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.9%3.1–4.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%73.6–79.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%78.4–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults90.9%89.7–92.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.0%65.7–72.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults78.4%76.3–80.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%73.5–82.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%13.1–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.3%7.0–9.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.1%13.9–18.5
Short sleep duration among adults29.8%26.8–33.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults11.3%9.8–12.9
Frequent mental distress among adults12.7%11.3–14.2
Frequent physical distress among adults9.0%8.0–10.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults8.8%7.7–10.0
Any disability among adults17.6%15.5–19.9
Hearing disability among adults4.4%3.9–4.9
Independent living disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.2
Mobility disability among adults7.3%6.3–8.4
Self-care disability among adults2.0%1.8–2.3
Vision disability among adults2.7%2.4–3.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.6–24.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.2%6.8–9.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.3–6.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.4–7.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Loneliness among adults30.0%26.6–33.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.4%3.7–5.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–642.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)72.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle0.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription99.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate88.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population29.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households40.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+10.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age39.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$182,827$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$577,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$2,548$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured