Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48089

in Warren, MichiganPopulation 31,853

39.60/ 100

Ranked #27,018 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #908 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 6.7%)

Ranked #188 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (bottom 12.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

12.7%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.1%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

15.5%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

20.7%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

38.1%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

27.1%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 48089, one of several in Warren, Michigan sits in the bottom 16% nationally (27,018th) and the bottom 6.7% of Michigan (908th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 2.5% nationally, modeled tree cover lies at the national minimum, and unemployment settles in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the top 6.3% nationally, utility shutoff is in the top 6.3% nationally, and housing insecurity rests in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 8.1% nationally, and loneliness registers in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled food insecurity lands in the top 8.6% nationally. More positively, floodplain exposure resides at the national minimum.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". ZIP 48015, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.3 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $52,366 predicts 77.5 years — 5.3 years below.

    Ranked #5,598 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.3 ± 1.1 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.8 years — 3.5 years below them.

    Ranked #2,751 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.1%25.7–30.7
High blood pressure among adults38.8%35.7–42.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%6.0–7.2
Current asthma among adults12.8%11.4–14.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.7%8.8–10.6
Depression among adults27.4%24.4–30.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.6%11.1–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%32.0–38.2
Obesity among adults43.0%38.3–47.7
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.9%15.0–21.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%8.3–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.0%72.2–77.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%77.0–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.8–85.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.1%57.9–66.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.3%55.1–61.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.3%69.1–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.1%13.7–18.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.2%18.9–23.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.8%29.3–36.7
Short sleep duration among adults43.1%39.0–47.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.2%23.6–28.9
Frequent mental distress among adults21.4%19.3–23.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.3%14.7–18.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%17.6–21.3
Any disability among adults37.3%33.9–41.0
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Independent living disability among adults11.8%10.7–13.0
Mobility disability among adults16.3%14.6–18.2
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.8–5.6
Vision disability among adults6.7%6.2–7.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.3%25.7–33.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.1%24.3–30.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults27.0%24.3–29.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.7%18.3–23.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.7%12.2–15.2
Loneliness among adults38.1%33.7–42.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.5%13.7–17.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6412.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)17.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)12.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle8.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription91.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate56.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population5.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households30.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+13.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age34.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$52,366$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$122,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,237$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.3 yr ± 0.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.54 years of 72.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured