Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48234

in Detroit, MichiganPopulation 32,760

26.98/ 100

Ranked #31,247 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.6%)

Ranked #966 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 0.8%)

Ranked #209 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (bottom 2.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

51.8%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

9.6%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

7.6%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

30%

in the top 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

16.5%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.1%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

35.5%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.8%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.5%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

47%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 48234, one of several in Detroit, Michigan, by its composite score, sits in the bottom 2.6% nationally (31,247th) and the bottom 0.8% of Michigan (966th).

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: modeled short sleep registers in the top 0.08% nationally, and self-care disability settles in the top 0.9% nationally. Modeled energy burden sits in the top 0.8% nationally, and utility shutoff lies in the top 0.10% nationally. Modeled independent living disability rests in the top 1.3% nationally, vision disability resides in the top 2.0% nationally, and housing insecurity is in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the top 1.6% nationally, fair or poor health stands in the top 1.8% nationally, and food insecurity registers in the top 0.6% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 48030, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.07%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 38%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.7 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $35,322 predicts 76.0 years — 4.3 years below.

    Ranked #5,211 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.7 ± 1.1 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 74.9 years — 3.2 years below them.

    Ranked #2,515 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.1%29.9–34.2
High blood pressure among adults50.8%48.2–53.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.0%4.6–5.5
Current asthma among adults14.8%13.4–16.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.9–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.4%11.2–13.5
Depression among adults22.6%20.3–24.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.4%19.5–23.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%32.6–37.5
Obesity among adults48.9%45.2–52.6
Stroke among adults6.8%6.4–7.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years27.5%23.8–31.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.2%9.6–12.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.3%76.2–80.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.4%81.3–85.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%83.5–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%57.9–64.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.0%45.1–50.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.3%72.7–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.6%9.1–12.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults24.3%22.0–26.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.7%38.4–45.0
Short sleep duration among adults51.8%48.4–55.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.5%33.7–39.3
Frequent mental distress among adults23.6%21.6–25.7
Frequent physical distress among adults19.2%17.4–20.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.7%18.7–22.6
Any disability among adults43.5%40.3–46.6
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Independent living disability among adults16.5%15.0–18.0
Mobility disability among adults24.9%22.8–26.9
Self-care disability among adults9.6%8.8–10.3
Vision disability among adults12.1%11.1–13.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults35.0%31.7–38.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults47.0%43.6–50.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults52.2%48.8–55.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.5%32.4–38.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults23.6%21.5–25.8
Loneliness among adults38.0%34.5–41.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults30.0%27.3–32.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate37.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–6413.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)16.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)14.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle17.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription79.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate53.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population1.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households24.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+15.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age32.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$35,322$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$61,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,015$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.7 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 71.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured