Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48228

in Detroit, MichiganPopulation 50,117

25.95/ 100

Ranked #31,363 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.2%)

Ranked #969 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 0.5%)

Ranked #212 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (bottom 1.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Energy-cost burden

7.8%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

17.1%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

50.4%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

9.2%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

30%

in the top 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

12.0%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

35.9%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

47.5%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

36.7%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

24.4%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, ZIP 48228, one of several in Detroit, Michigan ranks in the bottom 2.2% nationally (31,363rd) and the bottom 0.5% of Michigan (969th).

continue reading

The measures that press hardest set the tone here: modeled energy burden stands in the top 0.8% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled short sleep lies in the top 0.3% nationally, and self-care disability resides in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff lands in the top 0.10% nationally, vision disability registers in the top 2.1% nationally, and housing insecurity sits in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled food insecurity rests in the top 0.5% nationally, fair or poor health is in the top 1.7% nationally, and transportation stands in the top 0.8% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 48126, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.9%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 23%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 1.0%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.6 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $30,680 predicts 75.4 years — 2.8 years below.

    Ranked #3,909 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.6 ± 1.2 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 74.8 years — 2.2 years below them.

    Ranked #1,703 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.6%27.5–31.7
High blood pressure among adults46.2%43.7–48.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Current asthma among adults14.9%13.5–16.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.3–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.3%11.3–13.4
Depression among adults25.2%22.8–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.9%17.4–20.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.7%31.4–36.2
Obesity among adults47.7%43.9–51.4
Stroke among adults6.0%5.6–6.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.7%21.4–28.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%11.7–15.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.0%72.8–77.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%78.4–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults82.4%80.5–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.1%54.6–61.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.8%45.0–50.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.9%71.0–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.0%10.4–13.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.9%23.5–28.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.4%38.3–44.7
Short sleep duration among adults50.4%47.0–53.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults36.7%34.2–39.4
Frequent mental distress among adults25.3%23.3–27.5
Frequent physical distress among adults19.6%18.0–21.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.6%20.8–24.7
Any disability among adults43.7%40.8–46.7
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.7–6.9
Independent living disability among adults17.1%15.7–18.6
Mobility disability among adults23.2%21.4–25.1
Self-care disability among adults9.2%8.6–9.9
Vision disability among adults12.0%11.1–12.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults34.3%31.1–37.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults47.5%44.3–51.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults52.1%48.9–55.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.9%33.0–39.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults24.4%22.3–26.6
Loneliness among adults38.5%35.1–42.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults30.0%27.4–32.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate41.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–649.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)20.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)12.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle18.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription88.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)46.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate49.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population12.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households27.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+12.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age32.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$30,680$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$59,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,109$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.6 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 72.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured