Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48059

in Fort Gratiot, MichiganPopulation 15,499

55.81/ 100

Ranked #8,500 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #239 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #100 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.13 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.5%

in the bottom 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Fort Gratiot, Michigan (ZIP 48059), by its composite score, sits in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,500th) and the top 25% of Michigan (239th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The clearest bright points in the data come first here: mental-health providers resides in the top 8.0% nationally, and modeled colon screening is in the top 10.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Dental providers stands in the top 16% nationally, modeled humid heat registers in the bottom 16% nationally, and physicians settles in the top 18% nationally. By contrast, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas lies in the top 16% nationally, loud transportation noise rests in the top 18% nationally, and arsenic resides in the top 19% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 48049, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Disability

healthier than 42%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.6 ± 1.3 years. A median household income of $80,062 predicts 79.2 years — 1.6 years below.

    Ranked #2,035 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.8%29.6–36.6
High blood pressure among adults38.7%34.9–43.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.2%10.2–12.4
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.5–9.6
Depression among adults26.2%22.8–30.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.6%10.1–13.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.9%33.1–41.4
Obesity among adults34.0%28.1–41.3
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.8%8.0–12.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.6–6.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.1%77.6–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.2%79.4–85.2
Cholesterol screening among adults89.5%88.1–90.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.1%67.9–76.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.6%67.3–73.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%67.4–81.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.6–18.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.7–15.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.7%19.9–28.0
Short sleep duration among adults33.8%28.4–39.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.0%15.7–20.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.8–18.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.2%12.6–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.8–15.0
Any disability among adults32.2%28.4–36.7
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.4
Independent living disability among adults8.0%7.1–8.9
Mobility disability among adults14.6%12.7–16.8
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.9–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.6%18.3–25.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.2–13.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.1–11.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.2–10.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.1
Loneliness among adults32.2%27.3–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–646.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)7.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle6.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription92.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate83.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population2.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households57.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+26.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age48.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$80,062$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$221,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$994$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.6 yr ± 0.6478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.64 years of 77.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured