Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49325

in Freeport, MichiganPopulation 2,596

55.78/ 100

Ranked #8,544 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #240 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #31 of 79 Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

96.1%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.6%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

79%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

14.6%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Freeport, Michigan (ZIP 49325), on the composite measure, lands in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,544th) and the top 25% of Michigan (240th).

continue reading

What works most in this area's favor shows up clearly across the measures: floodplain exposure sits at the national minimum, and homeownership registers in the top 7.3% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 17% nationally, and housing-cost burden lies in the bottom 18% nationally. Working the other way, crowded housing settles in the top 9.2% nationally, and modeled arsenic stands in the top 14.7% nationally. Home broadband subscription is in the bottom 15% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Recreation sits at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

In everyday language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 48815, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Grand Rapids-Wyoming-Kentwood, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 65%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 98%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 24%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%26.4–32.0
High blood pressure among adults33.9%30.7–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.7–10.3
Current asthma among adults11.1%10.0–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.4%6.5–8.5
Depression among adults26.3%23.3–29.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.2–11.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%32.7–39.6
Obesity among adults36.7%30.9–42.8
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.3%9.4–13.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%5.0–7.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.6%73.8–79.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.3–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.0%86.4–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.8%66.1–73.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.8%70.0–75.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%72.3–83.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.7–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.4%12.1–17.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.6%19.1–26.4
Short sleep duration among adults33.0%28.3–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.1%14.8–19.6
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.3–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.7–15.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%12.0–15.5
Any disability among adults29.7%26.1–33.5
Hearing disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.2
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Mobility disability among adults12.3%10.7–14.1
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.3–24.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.4–13.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.3–12.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.7–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.6–7.4
Loneliness among adults30.4%26.0–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.6–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–642.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle1.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription79.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate96.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households41.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+9.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age29.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$90,472$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$319,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$754$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured