Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49676

in Rapid City, MichiganPopulation 3,620

53.63/ 100

Ranked #11,180 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #330 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #20 of 28 Traverse City, MI ZIPs (bottom 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Colon-cancer screening

74.1%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

61.3%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Rapid City, Michigan (ZIP 49676) sits in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,180th) and the top 34% of Michigan (330th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that most flatter this area set the tone for the rest: modeled colon screening registers in the top 4.6% nationally, homeownership is in the top 16% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the bottom 18% nationally. Modeled uninsured registers in the bottom 11.7% nationally, park land is in the top 20% nationally, and modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 21% nationally. Modeled loneliness registers in the bottom 23% nationally. Against that, modeled pfas is in the top 7.5% nationally. Physicians lies at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Childcare registers at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 49612, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Traverse City, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.1%31.1–36.9
High blood pressure among adults39.6%36.1–42.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.3%10.4–12.1
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.2–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.0%7.9–10.2
Depression among adults26.1%23.1–29.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.2–14.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%35.3–42.1
Obesity among adults36.9%30.7–43.0
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.1%8.6–11.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.7%4.7–6.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.0%77.7–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%78.8–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults89.2%87.8–90.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.1%70.7–77.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.3%66.6–72.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.4%71.8–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.6%13.3–17.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.7–17.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.6%20.2–27.3
Short sleep duration among adults32.7%27.8–38.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.8%16.5–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.9–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.1–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%12.0–15.1
Any disability among adults31.7%28.2–35.4
Hearing disability among adults8.7%7.9–9.6
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.2–9.2
Mobility disability among adults14.9%13.1–16.9
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%18.3–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.9–13.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.3–13.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.7–10.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.8–7.4
Loneliness among adults30.0%26.0–34.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–646.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)4.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription92.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate90.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households59.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+27.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age47.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$75,781$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$269,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$965$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 1.3478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.34 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured