Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46048

in Ingalls, IndianaPopulation 2,025

51.61/ 100

Ranked #13,955 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranked #192 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #66 of 115 Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loud transportation noise

4.8%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

38.9%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US4th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

13.8%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

140 intersections/sq mi

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.6%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.1%

in the bottom 10.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

10.4%

in the bottom 10.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.6%

in the bottom 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

2.8%

in the bottom 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Ingalls, Indiana (ZIP 46048) comes out in the top 44% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,955th) and the top 25% of Indiana (192nd).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 4.0% nationally, walkability registers in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss stands in the bottom 10.4% nationally. Modeled stroke lands in the bottom 8.3% nationally, and coronary heart disease is in the bottom 10.9% nationally. By contrast, modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 1.5% nationally, and arsenic rests in the top 1.7% nationally. Modeled transportation noise lies in the top 5.0% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas settles in the top 10.1% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 46040, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 6.4 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 77.9 — 72 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #16,534 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.3%22.4–28.3
High blood pressure among adults32.4%28.9–36.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.4–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.1–7.4
Depression among adults28.0%24.1–31.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.7%8.4–11.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.9%31.1–38.7
Obesity among adults33.4%27.7–39.2
Stroke among adults2.6%2.3–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.2%11.8–17.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.2%5.4–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.0%69.8–76.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%74.2–81.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.1%82.5–87.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.4%63.3–71.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.8%59.5–66.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.5%67.4–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.7%14.7–21.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.7%12.4–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.8%18.6–27.4
Short sleep duration among adults37.5%32.5–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.0%14.1–20.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.5%15.9–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.4–14.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.4%12.0–17.0
Any disability among adults26.7%22.7–31.0
Hearing disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Independent living disability among adults7.0%5.8–8.2
Mobility disability among adults10.4%8.6–12.2
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.4–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%18.8–26.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%9.0–15.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.5%4.7–8.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%7.8–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.4–8.0
Loneliness among adults33.2%28.6–37.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.8–8.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6414.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)10.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle1.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription90.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate70.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population5.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households36.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+9.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age38.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$72,102$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$178,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,379$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured