Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45854

in Lafayette, OhioPopulation 293

51.93/ 100

Ranked #13,545 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #303 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 26%)

Ranked #4 of 13 Lima, OH ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loud transportation noise

10.1%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

16.2%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

12.9%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

64.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

120 intersections/sq mi

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

18.9%

in the top 11.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.5%

in the bottom 10.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Lafayette, Ohio (ZIP 45854) ranks in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,545th) and the top 26% of Ohio (303rd).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: modeled disaster risk resides in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and expected annual loss lands in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Walkability registers in the top 8.0% nationally. Against that, modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 0.3% nationally, modeled transportation noise rests in the top 3.7% nationally, and unemployment is in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 5.6% nationally, and pfas settles in the top 6.3% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle resides in the top 10.9% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, loud transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 45817, about 2.9 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lima, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 66%

13%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 91%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 67%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 61%

11%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.0%25.0–31.0
High blood pressure among adults32.5%29.1–36.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.5–9.3
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.3–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%5.9–8.1
Depression among adults28.1%24.5–31.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.3–12.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%31.6–38.9
Obesity among adults36.2%30.7–42.0
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.5%6.1–9.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.8%5.3–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.3–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.5–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.2–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.7%67.8–75.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.0%61.9–68.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.5%67.9–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.9%15.9–22.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%12.4–17.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.2%20.3–28.5
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%32.6–42.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.2%13.6–18.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.0–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.0–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.7%11.8–15.8
Any disability among adults26.6%22.9–30.6
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.0–8.0
Mobility disability among adults11.0%9.3–12.9
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.4–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.1–4.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.0–25.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.0–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.5%5.8–9.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.5–11.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.0–7.1
Loneliness among adults37.1%32.1–42.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.1–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–647.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)1.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)12.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle12.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription92.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate77.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households47.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+19.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age32.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$53,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$121,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$647$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured