Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45808

in Beaverdam, OhioPopulation 350

53.15/ 100

Ranked #11,865 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #239 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #2 of 13 Lima, OH ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US1st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

73.4%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

15.1%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.8%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

100 intersections/sq mi

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

10.7%

in the bottom 10.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Beaverdam, Ohio (ZIP 45808) sits in the top 37% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,865th) and the top 20% of Ohio (239th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 0.5% nationally, modeled expected annual loss settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally, and floodplain exposure lands at the national minimum. Unemployment rests at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle settles at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. On the other hand, modeled pfas lands in the top 3.5% nationally, and transportation noise rests in the top 4.3% nationally. Modeled tree cover settles at the national minimum, and industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled binge drinking rests in the top 7.0% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 45817, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lima, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 33%

11%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.0%23.2–28.9
High blood pressure among adults31.5%28.2–34.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.1–8.8
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.3–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.5%5.5–7.6
Depression among adults27.7%24.2–31.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%8.8–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.6%30.2–37.2
Obesity among adults36.3%30.8–41.9
Stroke among adults2.8%2.4–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.4%8.5–12.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%5.6–9.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.2%72.3–78.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%75.0–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.8%82.2–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.8%66.6–74.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.8%61.7–67.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%65.3–78.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.8%16.6–23.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.9%11.7–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.8%19.7–28.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.6%33.0–42.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.0%13.3–18.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.1%15.8–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.5–13.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%11.5–16.0
Any disability among adults26.5%22.5–30.5
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.5–7.1
Independent living disability among adults6.9%5.8–8.0
Mobility disability among adults10.5%8.8–12.2
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.3–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.0–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.0–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%8.1–13.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.0–10.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%7.7–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.2–7.6
Loneliness among adults36.8%31.6–42.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.4–8.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)18.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription94.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate81.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households57.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+7.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age42.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$81,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$100,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,071$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.8 yr ± 1.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.74 years of 81.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured