Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

43434

in Harbor View, OhioPopulation 110

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

52.10/ 100

Ranked #13,321 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #291 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #22 of 61 Toledo, OH ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

92.3%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

170 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

14.8%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

37.9%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.7%

in the bottom 13.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Harbor View, Ohio (ZIP 43434) stands in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,321st) and the top 25% of Ohio (291st).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: modeled expected annual loss stands in the bottom 1.2% nationally, and transportation noise sits at the national minimum. Walkability resides in the top 3.9% nationally. Unemployment stands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Working the other way, modeled pfas sits in the top 0.3% nationally, industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 0.7% nationally, and tree cover stands at the national minimum. Households without a vehicle sits in the top 7.5% nationally, and modeled loneliness resides in the top 9.1% nationally. Fiber broadband stands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Set beside the wider area around it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 43616, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Toledo, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.4%23.9–29.2
High blood pressure among adults30.7%27.8–33.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.1–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.6–8.2
Depression among adults27.3%24.2–30.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.2–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.8%30.9–36.9
Obesity among adults31.3%27.0–35.8
Stroke among adults2.9%2.5–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.6%12.8–16.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.6%5.8–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.4%74.5–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%75.1–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.0–87.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.4%62.7–68.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.0%62.9–67.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%69.1–77.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.2%15.5–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.1%11.3–17.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.5%20.7–28.7
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%36.1–41.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.1%14.4–20.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.6%16.4–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.8%11.1–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.2%12.0–16.5
Any disability among adults27.4%23.6–31.3
Hearing disability among adults5.7%4.9–6.5
Independent living disability among adults7.2%6.1–8.5
Mobility disability among adults11.2%9.3–13.4
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%18.6–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.1–14.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.2–10.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.2–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.7–8.2
Loneliness among adults37.9%33.0–43.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.5–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle14.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription81.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate74.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households31.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+10.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age27.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$72,083$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$105,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$638$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.5 yr ± 1.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 76.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured