ZIP code
46290
in Carmel, IndianaPopulation 81
69.67/ 100
Ranked #649 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 2.1%)
Ranked #1 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 0.2%)
Ranked #1 of 115 Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN ZIPs (top 0.9%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Lack of transportation
2.7%
in the bottom 0.01% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
3.1%
in the bottom 0.02% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
4.1%
in the bottom 0.02% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
23.2%
in the bottom 0.05% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
2.3%
in the bottom 0.06% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
82.1%
in the top 0.06% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
9.2%
in the bottom 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
49%
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
6.9%
in the bottom 0.06% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
25.3%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, ZIP 46290, one of several in Carmel, Indiana comes out in the top 2.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (649th) and the top 0.2% of Indiana (1st).
The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: modeled transportation lands in the bottom 0.01% nationally, housing insecurity is in the bottom 0.02% nationally, and food insecurity resides in the bottom 0.02% nationally. Modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 0.05% nationally, utility shutoff lies in the bottom 0.06% nationally, and colon screening sits in the top 0.06% nationally. Modeled binge drinking settles in the bottom 0.6% nationally, and cognitive disability registers in the bottom 0.06% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the bottom 0.5% nationally. By contrast, modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 0.6% nationally.
Relative to the ZIPs around it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Locally, no neighbor ranks healthier overall than this ZIP.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 98%
16%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.01%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the top 0.02%
11%
Mental Health
in the top 0.5%
8%
Disability
healthier than 87%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 75%
5%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 54%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 27%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 30%
14%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
in the top 0.9%
16%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.00%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the top 0.00%
11%
Mental Health
in the top 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 95%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 74%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 33%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 39%
14%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 39%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 95%
16%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.00%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the top 0.00%
11%
Mental Health
in the top 0.00%
8%
Disability
healthier than 80%
7%
About typical
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 53%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 58%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 8%
21%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 36%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
46032
Indianashares a border
Score 68.59
Similar health profile
30148
Georgia99% similar profile
Score 63.94
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 38.0% | 34.6–41.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 46.8% | 43.3–50.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 17.1% | 15.5–18.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.1% | 8.1–10.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.7% | 8.2–11.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 6.2% | 4.7–8.7 |
| Depression among adults | 17.2% | 15.0–19.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 14.0% | 11.9–16.6 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 49.0% | 45.7–52.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 27.7% | 24.0–32.0 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.0% | 3.3–5.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 3.5% | 2.8–4.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 3.7% | 2.5–5.6 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 89.1% | 87.2–90.7 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 89.2% | 87.6–90.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 95.2% | 94.2–96.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 82.1% | 79.0–84.9 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 79.6% | 77.3–81.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 81.0% | 75.6–85.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 9.2% | 7.9–10.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 5.4% | 3.8–8.0 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 16.6% | 13.0–21.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 25.3% | 22.0–28.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 13.0% | 10.3–17.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 8.5% | 7.2–10.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 10.1% | 8.4–12.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 6.9% | 5.6–8.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 27.4% | 23.2–32.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 10.6% | 9.2–12.6 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 4.6% | 3.6–6.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 13.0% | 10.3–16.9 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 2.4% | 1.9–3.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.2% | 2.6–4.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 14.2% | 11.7–17.2 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 4.1% | 2.8–6.1 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 1.9% | 1.2–3.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 3.1% | 2.3–4.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 2.7% | 2.1–3.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 23.2% | 19.9–26.7 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 2.3% | 1.8–3.0 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 28.4% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 8.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 23.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 8.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 56.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 19.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 36.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 81.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764 |
| Foreign-born population | 23.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767 |
| Single-parent households | 100.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 53.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756 |
| Population 65+ | 80.2% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767 |
| Median age | 70.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721 |
| Median home value | $570,700 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $925 ($704–$1,261) n=640 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | IN median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 83.2 yr ± 1.57 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.57 years of 83.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured