Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

43519

in Evansport, OhioPopulation 257

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

54.36/ 100

Ranked #10,243 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #203 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US6th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

7.1%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

14.2%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

3.5%

in the bottom 11.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19%

in the top 11.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

10.8%

in the bottom 13.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.5%

in the bottom 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US15th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.3%

in the bottom 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

Evansport, Ohio (ZIP 43519), by its composite score, sits in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,243rd) and the top 17% of Ohio (203rd).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled transportation noise lands at the national minimum, and disaster risk stands in the bottom 3.2% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss registers in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and housing-cost burden settles in the bottom 6.5% nationally. Unemployment sits at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Poverty rests in the bottom 11.7% nationally. Pulling the other way, households without a vehicle resides in the top 8.1% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas lands in the top 10.2% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 43555, about 6.3 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 88%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 12%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.5%24.0–31.4
High blood pressure among adults34.5%30.2–39.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.6–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.8–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%5.7–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.4–8.2
Depression among adults24.2%20.5–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%9.8–13.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%31.2–39.9
Obesity among adults34.1%26.5–42.4
Stroke among adults3.0%2.5–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.7%12.0–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%5.5–9.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.6%74.5–80.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.1%74.2–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%83.6–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.2%59.6–68.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.5%62.9–70.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.5%62.4–77.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.0%15.5–22.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%11.5–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.2%18.3–28.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.0%31.6–45.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.1%13.2–19.9
Frequent mental distress among adults16.6%14.3–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%10.8–15.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.6%10.5–15.2
Any disability among adults26.2%21.8–31.3
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.6–7.5
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.2–7.7
Mobility disability among adults10.8%8.7–13.2
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.4–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.0–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%17.6–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.0–12.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.8%4.7–9.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%6.7–11.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.8%4.7–7.2
Loneliness among adults32.7%27.3–38.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.1%4.8–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–644.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle14.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription92.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)7.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate91.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households32.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+10.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age32.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$78,114$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$114,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.6 yr ± 1.3478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.34 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured