Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43567

in Wauseon, OhioPopulation 12,754

52.48/ 100

Ranked #12,789 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 40%)

Ranked #269 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranked #19 of 61 Toledo, OH ZIPs (top 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

24.8%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.15 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

10 µg/L

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.45 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

40.2 mi

in the top 18% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Wauseon, Ohio (ZIP 43567) ranks in the top 40% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,789th) and the top 23% of Ohio (269th).

continue reading

A number of measures place this area on solid footing: distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers rests in the top 6.6% nationally, and lithium in drinking water stands in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Outpatient lies in the top 9.5% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 12.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. By contrast, modeled arsenic is in the top 4.5% nationally, industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 9.6% nationally, and loud transportation noise resides in the top 13.1% nationally. Modeled transportation noise registers in the top 13.3% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Close by, ZIP 43555, about 2.4 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Toledo, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 63%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 70%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 81%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 79%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 32%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.5%28.4–34.9
High blood pressure among adults37.0%33.2–41.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.6–10.3
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.4–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Depression among adults24.6%21.2–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.3–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%34.4–42.7
Obesity among adults36.6%29.7–43.9
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.3%9.3–14.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.4–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.6–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%75.9–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.8–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.3%60.7–70.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.4%61.4–68.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.1%68.2–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%13.5–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.7–17.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.0%22.8–31.8
Short sleep duration among adults35.7%30.1–42.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.2%15.9–20.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.2–19.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.2–15.6
Any disability among adults29.4%25.4–33.7
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.5
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.7–15.5
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.1%17.8–24.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.1–13.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.5–10.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.6–11.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.7%5.8–7.5
Loneliness among adults33.9%28.7–39.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.8–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–644.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)5.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle3.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription87.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate78.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households46.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+18.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age39.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$70,417$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$189,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$821$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 0.6778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.67 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured