Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

20660

in Morganza, MarylandPopulation 14

53.10/ 100

Ranked #11,937 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 37%)

Ranked #340 of 458 Maryland ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranked #34 of 38 Lexington Park, MD ZIPs (bottom 10.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Households without a vehicle

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.4%

in the bottom 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.7%

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.7%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

Morganza, Maryland (ZIP 20660), on the composite measure, lands in the top 37% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,937th) and the bottom 26% of Maryland (340th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: housing-cost burden lands at the national minimum, homeownership resides at the national maximum, and lead in tap water lies at the national minimum. Modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 3.2% nationally, pfas stands in the bottom 6.2% nationally, and expected annual loss is in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease rests in the bottom 7.0% nationally. On the other hand, households without a vehicle sits at the national maximum, and home broadband subscription registers at the national minimum. Poverty lands at the national maximum.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, households without a vehicle runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 20650, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Lexington Park, MD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%26.4–33.9
High blood pressure among adults35.6%31.5–39.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.5–8.7
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.7–14.0
Coronary heart disease among adults4.7%3.9–5.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%4.1–8.0
Depression among adults23.7%20.5–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.8%9.6–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%35.1–42.2
Obesity among adults41.8%36.3–47.3
Stroke among adults2.8%2.2–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.6%10.1–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%4.6–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%72.8–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%76.1–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults92.0%90.1–93.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.4%57.0–65.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.9%58.8–65.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.7%65.9–78.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%13.7–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.5%9.5–19.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.0%16.8–29.7
Short sleep duration among adults41.0%36.8–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.4%12.8–23.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.3%14.0–20.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%10.1–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%9.7–16.7
Any disability among adults24.2%18.7–30.0
Hearing disability among adults4.4%3.6–5.2
Independent living disability among adults6.7%4.8–9.1
Mobility disability among adults11.6%8.3–15.4
Self-care disability among adults3.5%2.5–4.7
Vision disability among adults3.9%2.9–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%18.8–27.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.1%7.7–17.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.7%5.8–14.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.4%8.6–16.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.5%4.7–8.4
Loneliness among adults34.7%29.6–39.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.9%5.7–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate100.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3646.7% (1.1–19.3%) n=459
Uninsured 18–64100.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2864.8% (0.0–13.1%) n=459
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.3% (0.5–16.6%) n=463
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50537.3% (15.0–64.4%) n=463
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–8.6%) n=457
Households without a vehicle100.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.2% (0.0–12.4%) n=457
Broadband subscription0.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (81.2–100.0%) n=457
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.0% (12.0–41.8%) n=457
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (49.9–98.5%) n=457
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=457
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5536.2% (0.0–26.4%) n=464
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (34.0–73.3%) n=450
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.0% (10.9–33.1%) n=464
Median age42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.8 yr (34.2–57.2) n=460
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$106,181 ($62,879–$172,423) n=419
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$423,400 ($215,180–$683,660) n=427
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,626 ($958–$2,415) n=339
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MD median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.7 yr ± 1.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30879.5 yr (75.7–82.7) n=451

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.42 years of 78.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured