Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45342

in Miamisburg, OhioPopulation 36,152

54.40/ 100

Ranked #10,192 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #202 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #16 of 57 Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

595 units

in the top 3.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

11.5%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

58%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.7%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US83rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

32.6%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Miamisburg, Ohio (ZIP 45342) lands in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,192nd) and the top 17% of Ohio (202nd).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 3.6% nationally. Distance to a community health center registers at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled high cholesterol rests in the bottom 8.5% nationally. Distance to a nursing home stands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, distance to a Superfund site lies at the national minimum, modeled transportation noise lands in the top 6.8% nationally, and modeled pfas sits in the top 8.7% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the top 11.3% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 16% nationally, and modeled arsenic resides in the top 17% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 45066, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 63%

13%

Disability

healthier than 80%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 62%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 73%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 48%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 77.7 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $84,907 predicts 79.4 years — 1.7 years below.

    Ranked #2,156 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 8.4 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 71.5 — 63 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,712 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.1%24.5–29.7
High blood pressure among adults32.6%29.6–35.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.5
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.8–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.3%5.6–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Depression among adults26.2%23.2–29.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.7%29.6–36.0
Obesity among adults33.4%28.8–38.1
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.6%10.4–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.6–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.6–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.7–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%85.0–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%62.2–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults65.8%62.8–68.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.4%69.3–80.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.7–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.3%11.6–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.9%21.8–28.3
Short sleep duration among adults37.0%33.0–41.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.2%15.3–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.3–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults12.6%11.2–14.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.7%11.4–14.2
Any disability among adults27.3%24.3–30.6
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Mobility disability among adults11.9%10.6–13.4
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.8–3.4
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.4%16.6–22.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.1–12.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.2%7.0–9.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%8.0–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.7–7.2
Loneliness among adults35.2%30.7–39.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.7–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6411.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)6.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)33.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate65.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population5.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households45.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age38.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$84,907$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$230,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,312$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.7 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured