Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43525

in Haskins, OhioPopulation 1,229

61.67/ 100

Ranked #3,715 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.6%)

Ranked #56 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 4.8%)

Ranked #3 of 61 Toledo, OH ZIPs (top 5.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US1st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

20.6%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

3.4%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.7%

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.5%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

8.3%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.2%

in the bottom 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Haskins, Ohio (ZIP 43525) ranks in the top 11.6% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,715th) and the top 4.8% of Ohio (56th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled disaster risk stands in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles at the national minimum. Modeled food insecurity lies in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and tooth loss resides in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Modeled transportation lands in the bottom 5.1% nationally, hearing disability registers in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and mobility disability sits in the bottom 3.8% nationally. Modeled stroke rests in the bottom 3.5% nationally. On the other hand, modeled binge drinking is in the top 4.2% nationally, and tree cover stands at the national minimum.

In plainer terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 43617, about 12 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Toledo, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 35.5; chronic-disease standing 90.5 (top 10%) — 55 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #14,896 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.2%21.4–27.2
High blood pressure among adults29.2%25.9–32.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.7%3.8–5.8
Depression among adults27.3%23.8–31.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.4%7.2–9.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.1%28.6–35.8
Obesity among adults36.4%30.6–42.6
Stroke among adults2.2%1.9–2.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years3.4%2.7–4.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.1%3.9–7.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.1%71.8–78.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%75.7–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%85.5–89.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.0%61.7–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.3%69.3–75.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.0%67.6–81.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults20.6%17.3–23.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.6%7.9–13.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults17.5%13.9–21.7
Short sleep duration among adults35.4%30.3–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.4%10.1–15.3
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.4–18.0
Frequent physical distress among adults10.3%8.7–12.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.9%8.9–13.1
Any disability among adults22.0%18.4–26.0
Hearing disability among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Independent living disability among adults5.3%4.3–6.4
Mobility disability among adults8.3%6.7–10.2
Self-care disability among adults2.2%1.8–2.7
Vision disability among adults2.7%2.2–3.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.5%14.5–21.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.2–9.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.1%3.4–7.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.1%5.3–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.7–5.8
Loneliness among adults32.1%27.3–37.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%3.9–6.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–643.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle3.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription96.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate91.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population1.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households46.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+10.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age36.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$108,672$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$241,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$996$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured