ZIP code
39862
in Leary, GeorgiaPopulation 875
37.75/ 100
Ranked #28,167 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.2%)
Ranked #614 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 13.7%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Diabetes
22%
in the top 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.4%
in the top 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
52.2%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
10.3%
in the bottom 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS2ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
7.2%
in the top 5.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Arsenic in groundwater
1.1%
in the bottom 3.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST17thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
24.1%
in the top 4.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
25.3%
in the top 6.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST88thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
71.2%
in the bottom 6.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST8thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Humid extreme heat
141.8 days/year
in the top 6.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST87thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.
Full methodology ›The read
On balance, and by the composite measure, Leary, Georgia (ZIP 39862) ranks in the bottom 12.2% nationally (28,167th) and the bottom 13.7% of Georgia (614th).
The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled diabetes resides in the top 1.7% nationally, and stroke lands in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure registers in the top 1.8% nationally, and self-care disability sits in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled mobility disability rests in the top 4.7% nationally, modeled tooth loss is in the top 6.9% nationally, and home broadband subscription stands in the bottom 6.8% nationally. Modeled humid heat settles in the top 6.9% nationally. Better still, modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and arsenic resides in the bottom 3.3% nationally.
In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 31721, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 76%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 73%
8%
About typical
Preventive Care
healthier than 51%
13%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 8%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 26%
11%
Disability
healthier than 9%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 15%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 17%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 64%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 74%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 77%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 3%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 16%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 36%
11%
Disability
healthier than 12%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 11%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 5%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
31721
Georgiashares a border
Score 55.07
Closest healthier
39841
Georgiashares a border
Score 40.32
Similar health profile
31735
Georgia99% similar profile
Score 36.66
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 36.7% | 33.6–39.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 52.2% | 48.7–55.7 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.3% | 8.5–10.1 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.4% | 10.2–12.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.3% | 9.4–11.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.6% | 10.3–13.0 |
| Depression among adults | 18.7% | 16.4–21.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 22.0% | 19.8–24.2 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 44.7% | 41.3–48.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 42.4% | 36.1–49.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.4% | 5.9–7.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 25.3% | 21.7–28.8 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 13.6% | 11.6–16.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 85.1% | 83.3–86.7 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 83.5% | 81.2–85.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.5% | 88.1–90.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 64.8% | 60.7–68.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 47.1% | 44.0–50.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 73.3% | 67.1–78.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 10.3% | 8.8–12.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.0% | 16.6–21.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 37.2% | 32.9–41.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 40.4% | 34.8–45.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 29.5% | 26.5–32.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.3% | 15.6–19.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.6% | 16.8–20.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.3% | 14.6–18.0 |
| Any disability among adults | 39.7% | 35.7–43.6 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.1% | 8.3–10.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.3% | 11.0–13.7 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 24.1% | 21.6–26.7 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 7.2% | 6.5–8.0 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.8% | 8.0–9.7 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 26.5% | 23.4–29.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 24.6% | 21.6–27.7 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 22.5% | 19.7–25.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 17.8% | 15.9–20.0 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 11.9% | 10.6–13.3 |
| Loneliness among adults | 36.8% | 32.6–40.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 12.4% | 11.0–13.9 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 16.3% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 13.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 18.8% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 18.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 8.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 12.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 35.6% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 21.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 2.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707 |
| Broadband subscription | 71.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 17.5% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 25.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707 |
| Homeownership rate | 86.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 73.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707 |
| Foreign-born population | 4.6% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 3.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720 |
| Single-parent households | 54.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705 |
| Population 65+ | 39.3% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720 |
| Median age | 56.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 39.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715 |
| Median household income | $46,458 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677 |
| Median home value | $155,200 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666 |
| Median gross rent | $829 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $993 ($694–$1,769) n=627 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | GA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 80.9 yr ± 1.74 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 76.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.74 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured