Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31721

in Albany, GeorgiaPopulation 19,435

55.07/ 100

Ranked #9,370 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #152 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #1 of 15 Albany, GA ZIPs (top 6.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST11th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

142.3 days/year

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.3%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

30.3%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

2.5 mi

in the bottom 13.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

71.6%

in the top 12.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.51%

in the top 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US80th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

In its overall standing, ZIP 31721, one of several in Albany, Georgia lands in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,370th) and the top 21% of Georgia (152nd).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and mammography settles in the top 5.8% nationally. Distance to a community health center is at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 10.6% nationally, and colon screening lands in the top 12.3% nationally. On the other side, modeled humid heat lies in the top 6.7% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands in the top 9.9% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site rests in the bottom 13.0% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water registers in the top 13.9% nationally. Modeled loneliness resides in the top 15% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. No nearby ZIP ranks healthier overall than this one.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Albany, GA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 70%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 91%

8%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 37%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 93%

16%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the top 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.4 ± 1.3 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.4 years — 3.0 years above them.

    Ranked #819 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%25.9–31.9
High blood pressure among adults42.9%39.1–46.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.1
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Depression among adults17.6%15.1–20.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.4–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.2–41.9
Obesity among adults35.9%30.1–42.3
Stroke among adults4.2%3.9–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.4%10.4–14.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.1%8.7–11.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.3%78.9–83.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.7%79.9–85.3
Cholesterol screening among adults89.8%88.5–91.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.6%67.6–75.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.1%60.9–67.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.3%75.8–86.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.6%10.4–15.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.2%10.6–13.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.0%21.5–28.7
Short sleep duration among adults39.7%34.4–45.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.3%18.1–22.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.8–17.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.4%12.0–15.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.9%11.5–14.4
Any disability among adults29.8%26.4–33.4
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.8–9.7
Mobility disability among adults15.3%13.6–17.1
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.1–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%20.9–27.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.8–19.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.7–16.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.7–16.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.2%8.2–10.3
Loneliness among adults36.4%31.5–41.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.7–11.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6411.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)5.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle2.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription92.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate69.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population2.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households46.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+20.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age44.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$77,177$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$216,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,206$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 0.6678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.66 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured