Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39859

in Iron City, GeorgiaPopulation 980

47.73/ 100

Ranked #19,281 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #339 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.54%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

35.3%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

149.3 days/year

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.81 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

11.5%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.5%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.8 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 13.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Iron City, Georgia (ZIP 39859) ranks in the bottom 40% nationally (19,281st) and the top 48% of Georgia (339th).

continue reading

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled arsenic resides at the national minimum, and civic registers in the top 6.1% nationally. Set against that, poverty rests in the top 4.3% nationally, and modeled humid heat stands in the top 4.9% nationally. Unemployment lies in the top 7.0% nationally, slow internet speeds lands in the top 7.7% nationally, and home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 11.9% nationally. Modeled loneliness is in the top 12.4% nationally, walkability settles in the bottom 13.6% nationally, and households without a vehicle resides in the top 14.4% nationally.

To spell things out, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. Close by, ZIP 32446, about 14 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Disability

healthier than 30%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 73%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 68%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 64%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.3%27.9–34.9
High blood pressure among adults42.5%38.3–46.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.3
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.4–9.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.7–10.1
Depression among adults20.1%17.1–23.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.2%13.3–17.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.8%36.5–45.3
Obesity among adults36.7%29.1–45.0
Stroke among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.7%15.5–22.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.3%10.2–14.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.3%78.9–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.4–82.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.4–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.6%62.4–72.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.1%53.4–60.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.3%66.0–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.1–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%13.1–18.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.6%25.0–34.7
Short sleep duration among adults37.1%30.3–44.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.0%20.0–26.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.4–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.7%13.9–17.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%13.5–17.7
Any disability among adults34.9%30.4–39.7
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.7
Independent living disability among adults10.1%8.9–11.4
Mobility disability among adults17.8%15.5–20.3
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.5
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.9%20.2–27.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.3–19.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.6–16.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.4–15.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.8–10.3
Loneliness among adults37.0%31.6–42.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.4–10.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate35.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6419.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)23.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)11.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle10.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription76.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate83.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population0.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households44.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+17.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age44.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$137,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$728$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.2 yr ± 1.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.45 years of 73.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured