Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39825

in Brinson, GeorgiaPopulation 1,766

47.00/ 100

Ranked #20,158 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #363 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.62%

in the bottom 0.02% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

152.8 days/year

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.9%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.6 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 12.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Brinson, Georgia (ZIP 39825) stands in the bottom 37% nationally (20,158th) and the bottom 49% of Georgia (363rd).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 0.02% nationally. By contrast, modeled humid heat is in the top 4.0% nationally, and crowded housing registers in the top 8.7% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loneliness is in the top 10.1% nationally, fatal road crashes registers in the top 10.3% nationally, and walkability lies in the bottom 12.0% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Floodplain exposure registers in the top 16% nationally. Recreation lies at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

For clarity, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. ZIP 39859, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 51%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 86.3; chronic-disease standing 31.2 — 55 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,106 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.3%27.1–33.8
High blood pressure among adults42.5%38.4–46.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–10.0
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.1%7.2–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.7–10.0
Depression among adults20.7%17.7–24.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.6–17.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%37.1–45.9
Obesity among adults37.7%30.3–45.8
Stroke among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.2%13.4–19.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.8%10.6–15.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.0%78.5–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%76.3–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.3–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%61.4–70.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.4%50.7–58.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.1%66.5–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.4–16.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%14.3–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.1%25.5–35.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.8%32.5–45.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.9%20.0–26.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%16.0–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.4–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%13.8–17.7
Any disability among adults34.8%30.4–39.6
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.5–9.3
Independent living disability among adults9.9%8.8–11.2
Mobility disability among adults17.4%15.2–19.8
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.4
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.5–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.4%20.9–28.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.1%14.5–19.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.8%11.7–16.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.7–15.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.8–10.0
Loneliness among adults37.6%32.3–43.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.6–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6420.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)7.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle1.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription92.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate68.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households46.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+22.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age32.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$65,254$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$138,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,095$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.6 yr ± 1.3278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.32 years of 72.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured