Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39819

in Bainbridge, GeorgiaPopulation 12,140

42.03/ 100

Ranked #25,185 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #512 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

153 days/year

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

39.1%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

1.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

12.2%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

9.6%

in the top 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

15.6%

in the top 10.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

0.60%

in the bottom 23% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 39819, one of several in Bainbridge, Georgia, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 21% nationally (25,185th) and the bottom 28% of Georgia (512th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 2.5% nationally, pharmacy lands in the top 5.3% nationally, and physicians resides in the top 8.4% nationally. Modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 7.9% nationally. On the other hand, modeled humid heat settles in the top 3.9% nationally, and loneliness stands in the top 5.9% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity is in the top 10.2% nationally, and unemployment rests in the top 10.4% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff sits in the top 10.6% nationally, and diabetes registers in the top 10.2% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 39825, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 19%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.3 ± 1.9 years. A median household income of $55,426 predicts 77.7 years — 2.5 years below.

    Ranked #3,401 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 69.9; chronic-disease standing 18.6 — 51 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,386 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.2%26.9–33.7
High blood pressure among adults44.6%40.1–49.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.2%7.4–9.1
Current asthma among adults11.2%9.9–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.4%7.4–9.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.4–10.7
Depression among adults20.3%17.2–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.4%15.3–19.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%36.1–45.0
Obesity among adults40.9%32.7–49.4
Stroke among adults5.1%4.7–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.4%17.8–25.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.6%13.4–18.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.5%77.9–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.1–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.5%84.8–88.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.1%57.8–68.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.9%49.2–56.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%65.6–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%9.9–14.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.8%15.4–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.4%28.4–38.4
Short sleep duration among adults40.6%34.1–47.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.9%23.7–30.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.8–21.2
Frequent physical distress among adults17.3%15.3–19.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.5–19.4
Any disability among adults37.6%32.9–42.1
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Independent living disability among adults12.0%10.6–13.3
Mobility disability among adults19.9%17.4–22.2
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Vision disability among adults8.0%7.2–8.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.2%22.3–30.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.5%21.3–27.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.9%19.0–24.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.2%16.7–21.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.6%11.0–14.2
Loneliness among adults39.1%33.4–44.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.5–14.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6420.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)18.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)9.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle6.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription81.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate62.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population4.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households50.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+20.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age40.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$55,426$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$181,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$797$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.3 yr ± 0.9678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.96 years of 75.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured