Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39401

in Hattiesburg, MississippiPopulation 42,531

42.17/ 100

Ranked #25,065 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #175 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranked #9 of 11 Hattiesburg, MS ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,455 units

in the top 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

16.6%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

30.8%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

15.9%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

145.5 days/year

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.9 µg/L

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

31.1%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 39401, one of several in Hattiesburg, Mississippi sits in the bottom 22% nationally (25,065th) and the top 43% of Mississippi (175th).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: distance to a Superfund site lies at the national minimum, modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 3.2% nationally, and modeled transportation is in the top 4.5% nationally. Modeled food insecurity lies in the top 5.6% nationally, utility shutoff registers in the top 5.7% nationally, and humid heat is in the top 5.9% nationally. Poverty lies in the top 6.3% nationally. On the better side, subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 0.7% nationally. Distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Lithium in drinking water lies in the bottom 6.2% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, subsidized affordable housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 39402, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Hattiesburg, MS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Disability

healthier than 17%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 85%

21%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.00%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.5 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $41,127 predicts 76.6 years — 3.0 years below.

    Ranked #4,190 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.4%23.4–29.3
High blood pressure among adults42.0%38.0–45.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.3–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.8–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Depression among adults20.6%17.4–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%12.9–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.8%29.8–37.6
Obesity among adults39.1%32.4–45.5
Stroke among adults4.3%4.0–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.8%19.2–26.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.9%11.2–14.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.3%73.7–78.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%76.9–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults82.4%80.3–84.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.3%57.1–67.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults7.8%6.5–9.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.5%66.8–80.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.2–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.1%15.0–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.7%29.1–38.1
Short sleep duration among adults42.2%36.4–47.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.0%23.3–28.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.5–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.0–16.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.5%18.4–22.6
Any disability among adults40.5%36.1–44.8
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Independent living disability among adults12.1%11.0–13.4
Mobility disability among adults18.0%16.0–20.0
Self-care disability among adults5.8%5.4–6.3
Vision disability among adults8.3%7.7–9.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.9%26.6–34.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults30.8%28.0–34.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.7%18.4–23.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.1%19.8–24.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.6%15.0–18.3
Loneliness among adults38.3%34.0–43.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.9%14.3–17.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6418.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)10.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)9.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle10.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription84.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate43.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households41.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+13.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age30.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$41,127$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$134,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$948$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.5 yr ± 0.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.49 years of 73.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured