ZIP code
93241
in Lamont, CaliforniaPopulation 15,250
21.50/ 100
Ranked #31,776 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.0%)
Ranked #1,718 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 0.06%)
Ranked #48 of 48 Bakersfield-Delano, CA ZIPs (bottom 2.1%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Vision disability
17.4%
in the top 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Uninsured (under 65)
35.9%
in the top 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
38.5%
in the bottom 0.2% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
46.8%
in the top 0.05% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
10.3%
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
29%
in the top 0.2% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
40.6%
in the top 0.02% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
54.3%
in the top 0.03% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
17.5%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
27.1%
in the top 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Lamont, California (ZIP 93241) lands in the bottom 1.0% nationally (31,776th) and the bottom 0.06% of California (1,718th).
Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled vision disability sits in the top 0.2% nationally, and uninsured is in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and fair or poor health resides in the top 0.05% nationally. Modeled self-care disability registers in the top 0.6% nationally, cognitive disability rests in the top 0.2% nationally, and housing insecurity stands in the top 0.02% nationally. Modeled food insecurity lies in the top 0.03% nationally, independent living disability lands in the top 0.8% nationally, and transportation sits in the top 0.4% nationally.
Set beside the nearby areas, crowded housing runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 93307, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Bakersfield-Delano, CA metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Healthcare Access
healthier than 61%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 44%
21%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.3%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 35%
14%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.07%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 1%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 7%
8%
Disability
in the bottom 1.0%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the bottom 0.3%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 64%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 16%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.07%
16%
Preventive Care
in the bottom 0.6%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the bottom 0.07%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 2%
8%
Disability
in the bottom 0.7%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 1%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 39%
5%
Nothing measured is lifting this score.
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 41%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 59%
14%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 57%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.00%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the bottom 0.00%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 11%
8%
Disability
healthier than 4%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
in the bottom 0.00%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
93307
Californiashares a border
Score 29.10
Closest healthier
93203
Californiaabout 1.0 mi away
Score 29.99
Similar health profile
93266
California99% similar profile
Score 28.22
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 20.4% | 18.0–22.8 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 34.1% | 30.6–37.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 3.5% | 3.1–3.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.7% | 9.4–12.0 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.6% | 6.8–8.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 8.2% | 7.3–9.1 |
| Depression among adults | 23.6% | 20.4–27.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 18.9% | 16.8–20.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 33.8% | 30.2–37.3 |
| Obesity among adults | 43.8% | 37.8–49.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.5% | 4.1–4.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 31.5% | 26.7–36.5 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 35.9% | 31.4–40.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 64.7% | 61.2–67.9 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 66.5% | 62.3–70.4 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 72.6% | 69.7–75.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 38.5% | 33.7–43.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 33.2% | 30.1–36.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 66.5% | 58.2–74.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 14.9% | 12.4–17.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 20.9% | 18.2–23.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 49.1% | 44.2–54.1 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 42.7% | 37.5–48.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 46.8% | 42.6–51.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 23.8% | 21.4–26.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 23.0% | 20.6–25.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 29.0% | 26.1–32.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 51.1% | 46.5–55.8 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.1% | 7.2–9.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 17.5% | 15.7–19.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 26.3% | 23.6–29.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 10.3% | 9.3–11.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 17.4% | 15.8–19.0 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 34.9% | 30.8–39.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 54.3% | 49.4–58.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 54.4% | 50.0–58.6 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 40.6% | 36.6–44.6 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 27.1% | 24.2–29.9 |
| Loneliness among adults | 41.3% | 36.5–46.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 23.6% | 21.0–26.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 38.2% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 25.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 7.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 59.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 4.2% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 12.1% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 6.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714 |
| Households without a vehicle | 9.1% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708 |
| Broadband subscription | 81.2% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 93.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 48.9% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 38.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708 |
| Homeownership rate | 43.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 64.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 25.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 4.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708 |
| Foreign-born population | 43.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 18.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730 |
| Single-parent households | 32.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 48.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692 |
| Population 65+ | 9.9% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730 |
| Median age | 31.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712 |
| Median household income | $33,417 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584 |
| Median home value | $211,900 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593 |
| Median gross rent | $962 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | CA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.2 yr ± 1.09 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 77.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured