Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

75210

in Dallas, TexasPopulation 7,722

29.50/ 100

Ranked #30,865 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.8%)

Ranked #1,829 of 1,868 Texas ZIPs (bottom 2.1%)

Ranked #265 of 265 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX ZIPs (bottom 0.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

31.9%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

13.1%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

9.1%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

37.9%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

31.8%

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

50.8%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.1%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22.7%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

47.7%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

90.9 days/year

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 75210, one of several in Dallas, Texas ranks in the bottom 3.8% nationally (30,865th) and the bottom 2.1% of Texas (1,829th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled uninsured sits in the top 0.8% nationally, and vision disability is in the top 1.2% nationally. Modeled self-care disability settles in the top 1.4% nationally, and fair or poor health resides in the top 1.2% nationally. Modeled tooth loss registers in the top 2.2% nationally, colon screening rests in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and independent living disability stands in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability lies in the top 2.8% nationally, obesity lands in the top 1.7% nationally, and extreme heat sits in the top 2.7% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 75215, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 1.0%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.1 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $33,712 predicts 75.8 years — 4.7 years below.

    Ranked #5,421 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.1 ± 1.4 years. The 37 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.2 years — 6.1 years below them.

    Ranked #3,553 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.0%20.6–25.4
High blood pressure among adults43.4%40.3–46.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults3.7%3.3–4.1
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.5–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.5–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%8.0–10.3
Depression among adults19.9%17.4–22.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.6%17.6–21.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%33.7–40.1
Obesity among adults47.7%43.1–52.6
Stroke among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years31.8%27.4–36.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years31.9%28.2–35.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.6%73.0–78.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%72.8–78.5
Cholesterol screening among adults79.5%77.1–81.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years50.8%46.5–55.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults34.9%32.1–37.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.6%63.8–76.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.6%11.6–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.5%18.7–24.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults45.7%41.2–50.3
Short sleep duration among adults44.2%40.4–48.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults37.9%34.2–41.9
Frequent mental distress among adults21.8%19.5–24.3
Frequent physical distress among adults18.0%16.0–20.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.7%20.2–25.3
Any disability among adults42.1%38.1–46.4
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Independent living disability among adults15.1%13.4–16.9
Mobility disability among adults23.3%20.7–26.0
Self-care disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.1
Vision disability among adults13.1%11.9–14.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.4% (3.5–26.4%) n=1,869
Uninsured 18–6458.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28622.3% (8.2–41.5%) n=1,862
No HS diploma (25+)30.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.2% (2.5–30.0%) n=1,881
Bachelor's or higher (25+)9.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.9% (9.0–51.4%) n=1,881
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.4%) n=1,865
Households without a vehicle18.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.7% (0.0–10.8%) n=1,868
Broadband subscription79.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.2% (75.0–97.3%) n=1,868
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32226.2% (8.8–40.3%) n=1,868
Homeownership rate35.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (46.4–92.3%) n=1,868
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3223.1% (0.0–9.0%) n=1,868
Foreign-born population27.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5538.1% (0.1–26.4%) n=1,886
Single-parent households42.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.5% (34.3–70.6%) n=1,861
Population 65+18.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55316.1% (8.6–30.1%) n=1,886
Median age30.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29238.3 yr (30.9–52.3) n=1,866
Median household income$33,712$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$69,983 ($46,006–$112,413) n=1,737
Median home value$122,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$210,500 ($97,060–$429,760) n=1,693
Median gross rent$1,033$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,154 ($764–$1,815) n=1,508
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TX median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.1 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.2 yr (75.1–81.7) n=1,772

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 71.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured