Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38637

in Horn Lake, MississippiPopulation 26,647

42.96/ 100

Ranked #24,411 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #154 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #36 of 81 Memphis, TN-MS-AR ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

9.6 µg/L

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

38.9%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

21.7%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.6%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

14.4%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

14.5%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST67th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

27.8%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Horn Lake, Mississippi (ZIP 38637), overall, ranks in the bottom 24% nationally (24,411th) and the top 38% of Mississippi (154th).

continue reading

Reading the numbers as a whole, the picture lands somewhere in between: lithium in drinking water registers in the bottom 4.7% nationally. On the other side, modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the top 4.5% nationally, industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 5.4% nationally, and expected annual loss is in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled loneliness sits in the top 6.3% nationally, and housing insecurity lands in the top 6.9% nationally. Modeled short sleep lies in the top 7.5% nationally, and transportation stands in the top 7.3% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the top 7.8% nationally, and food insecurity registers in the top 8.0% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 38651, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Memphis, TN-MS-AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 12%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.7 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $53,311 predicts 77.6 years — 1.9 years below.

    Ranked #2,363 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 75.7 ± 1.8 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.3%23.3–29.4
High blood pressure among adults42.3%38.2–46.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.8%5.2–6.4
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.9%5.3–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
Depression among adults20.8%17.7–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.4–16.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%31.3–39.3
Obesity among adults42.3%35.6–49.3
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.6%14.5–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.4%11.6–15.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.1%73.1–79.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.2–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults84.6%82.5–86.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.5%53.0–63.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults8.5%7.2–9.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.6%65.3–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.0%11.4–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.5%16.2–21.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.4%29.8–39.5
Short sleep duration among adults42.6%36.5–48.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.5%22.7–28.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.3%17.2–21.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%12.9–16.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%17.4–21.7
Any disability among adults38.2%33.9–42.9
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.9–12.2
Mobility disability among adults17.4%15.4–19.7
Self-care disability among adults5.3%4.9–5.8
Vision disability among adults7.3%6.7–7.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.9%27.9–35.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.8%24.8–31.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.4%15.2–20.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.7%19.3–24.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.4%12.9–16.1
Loneliness among adults38.9%34.0–43.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.9–16.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate19.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6419.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)13.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle5.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription88.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate58.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)4.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population6.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households42.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+11.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age33.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$53,311$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$171,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$1,435$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.7 yr ± 0.9178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.91 years of 75.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured