Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

92274

in Thermal, CaliforniaPopulation 18,167

30.22/ 100

Ranked #30,723 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.2%)

Ranked #1,676 of 1,719 California ZIPs (bottom 2.6%)

Ranked #151 of 153 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA ZIPs (bottom 1.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

29.7%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

44.6%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

13.3%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

40.4%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

24.9%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

34.1%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

126.3 days/year

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.0%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

43.6%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.7%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Thermal, California (ZIP 92274) ranks in the bottom 4.2% nationally (30,723rd) and the bottom 2.6% of California (1,676th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled uninsured is in the top 1.2% nationally, and colon screening settles in the bottom 0.7% nationally. Modeled vision disability resides in the top 1.1% nationally, and fair or poor health registers in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability rests in the top 1.1% nationally, housing insecurity stands in the top 0.5% nationally, and extreme heat lies in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled self-care disability lands in the top 2.8% nationally, food insecurity sits in the top 1.2% nationally, and independent living disability is in the top 3.0% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Close by, ZIP 92004, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.7%

16%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 3%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 75%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 1%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 1%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.3 ± 1.8 years. A median household income of $38,654 predicts 76.3 years — 6.0 years above.

    Ranked #18 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.3 ± 1.8 years. The 42 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.9 years — 3.4 years above them.

    Ranked #618 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.3%19.6–23.0
High blood pressure among adults33.4%31.0–35.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.1%3.8–4.4
Current asthma among adults9.9%9.0–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.4–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%6.3–7.5
Depression among adults22.6%20.4–24.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.2%14.9–17.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.6%33.2–38.0
Obesity among adults42.0%37.9–45.9
Stroke among adults3.9%3.7–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.6%19.6–25.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years29.7%27.0–32.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure65.9%63.4–68.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults66.3%63.4–69.1
Cholesterol screening among adults76.3%74.3–78.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years44.6%41.0–48.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults40.7%38.1–43.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.7%64.1–75.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%12.6–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%15.7–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults41.8%38.6–45.1
Short sleep duration among adults43.1%39.3–47.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults40.4%37.9–43.0
Frequent mental distress among adults21.1%19.4–22.9
Frequent physical distress among adults20.5%18.9–22.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults24.9%23.1–27.0
Any disability among adults46.2%43.3–49.3
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Independent living disability among adults14.7%13.5–15.9
Mobility disability among adults22.7%20.9–24.5
Self-care disability among adults8.0%7.5–8.6
Vision disability among adults13.3%12.5–14.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.6%30.8–36.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults43.6%40.6–46.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults40.1%37.3–42.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.1%31.4–36.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults21.4%19.6–23.2
Loneliness among adults41.4%38.1–44.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults18.1%16.3–19.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (4.1–24.9%) n=1,714
Uninsured 18–6417.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.7% (1.7–17.9%) n=1,704
No HS diploma (25+)54.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.8% (1.4–30.9%) n=1,729
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.3% (9.9–68.2%) n=1,729
Unemployment rate (16+)13.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2746.1% (0.8–12.0%) n=1,714
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.0–12.2%) n=1,708
Broadband subscription84.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.4% (82.1–98.4%) n=1,708
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32238.6% (24.4–50.5%) n=1,708
Homeownership rate72.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32264.1% (31.9–86.4%) n=1,708
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3224.8% (0.0–15.9%) n=1,708
Foreign-born population42.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55318.9% (3.0–40.4%) n=1,730
Single-parent households44.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.4% (35.1–72.3%) n=1,692
Population 65+14.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (9.7–35.7%) n=1,730
Median age35.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.1 yr (31.8–57.0) n=1,712
Median household income$38,654$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,448 ($54,188–$159,562) n=1,584
Median home value$163,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$659,800 ($300,520–$1,493,340) n=1,593
Median gross rent$925$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,912 ($1,113–$2,923) n=1,461
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)CA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.3 yr ± 0.9278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.5 yr (76.7–83.8) n=1,665

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.92 years of 82.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured