Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39097

in Louise, MississippiPopulation 483

21.48/ 100

Ranked #31,777 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.0%)

Ranked #401 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 1.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

12.3%

in the top 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

15.6%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

8.8%

in the top 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

27%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

18.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

33%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

41.7%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

59.5%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

55%

in the top 0.04% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

34.5%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Louise, Mississippi (ZIP 39097) sits in the bottom 1.0% nationally (31,777th) and the bottom 1.3% of Mississippi (401st).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: modeled self-care disability lies in the top 0.09% nationally, vision disability registers in the top 0.3% nationally, and stroke is in the top 0.10% nationally. Modeled diabetes lies in the top 0.2% nationally, independent living disability registers in the top 0.4% nationally, and mobility disability is in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health lies in the top 0.4% nationally, and high blood pressure registers in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled obesity is in the top 0.04% nationally, and tooth loss lies in the top 1.3% nationally.

A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 38721, just across the boundary. Modeled diabetes lies in the top 0.2% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 0.9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.6%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 29%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.9%34.1–41.9
High blood pressure among adults59.5%55.1–64.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.7–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults11.8%10.5–13.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults15.2%13.2–17.5
Depression among adults19.3%16.2–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults27.0%24.0–30.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.9%37.4–46.8
Obesity among adults55.0%46.5–63.9
Stroke among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years34.5%29.4–39.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years17.5%13.8–21.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.2%81.0–85.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.7%81.9–87.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.3–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.3%53.9–64.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults5.5%4.6–6.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.1%63.6–79.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults8.9%7.2–11.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults26.0%22.1–30.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults51.4%45.3–57.8
Short sleep duration among adults43.8%36.6–51.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults41.7%37.0–46.9
Frequent mental distress among adults20.3%17.7–23.0
Frequent physical distress among adults21.3%18.7–24.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults24.1%21.0–27.6
Any disability among adults52.0%46.5–57.7
Hearing disability among adults10.2%9.0–11.5
Independent living disability among adults18.8%16.4–21.5
Mobility disability among adults33.0%29.4–37.0
Self-care disability among adults12.3%10.8–14.0
Vision disability among adults15.6%13.7–17.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults35.1%30.3–39.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults46.3%40.4–51.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults39.1%33.4–44.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.8%27.5–36.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults24.2%20.9–27.5
Loneliness among adults40.0%34.4–46.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults25.6%22.3–28.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate60.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6432.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)14.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)20.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle12.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription48.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)57.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate72.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households13.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+25.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age40.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$21,622$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$744$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 3.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.09 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured