Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71662

in Pickens, ArkansasPopulation 100

19.69/ 100

Ranked #31,900 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 0.6%)

Ranked #560 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (bottom 0.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

12.5%

in the top 0.06% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

9.0%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

37.1%

in the top 0.05% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

15.6%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

27.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

44.9%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

15.5%

in the top 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

18.4%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

60.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

14.8%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Pickens, Arkansas (ZIP 71662), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 0.6% nationally (31,900th) and the bottom 0.4% of Arkansas (560th).

continue reading

What the data shows most clearly about this place comes first: modeled self-care disability settles in the top 0.06% nationally, stroke stands in the top 0.08% nationally, and mobility disability is in the top 0.05% nationally. Modeled vision disability rests in the top 0.3% nationally, diabetes sits in the top 0.2% nationally, and fair or poor health registers in the top 0.08% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lands in the top 0.10% nationally, and independent living disability resides in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lies in the top 0.2% nationally, and hearing disability settles in the top 0.5% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 71639, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.07%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults44.4%40.4–48.6
High blood pressure among adults60.7%56.2–65.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.2–11.4
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.5–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults15.5%13.9–17.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults19.2%16.6–22.1
Depression among adults23.2%19.8–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults27.7%24.6–31.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened49.1%44.3–54.2
Obesity among adults48.4%39.9–57.1
Stroke among adults9.0%8.0–10.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years28.1%23.7–33.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.9%16.1–24.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.9%82.1–87.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.4%80.2–86.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%84.9–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.3%50.8–62.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults38.0%34.3–42.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years64.6%55.6–73.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.1%7.3–11.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults26.0%22.0–30.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults52.5%46.0–59.1
Short sleep duration among adults42.6%36.1–50.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults44.9%39.6–50.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.2–22.1
Frequent physical distress among adults26.5%23.4–29.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults24.4%21.3–27.7
Any disability among adults55.4%49.8–61.1
Hearing disability among adults14.8%13.2–16.6
Independent living disability among adults18.4%16.0–21.0
Mobility disability among adults37.1%32.9–41.5
Self-care disability among adults12.5%10.9–14.3
Vision disability among adults15.6%13.7–17.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.8%26.7–35.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults37.3%32.1–42.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults29.7%25.0–34.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.7%21.4–28.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults18.1%15.8–20.6
Loneliness among adults34.9%29.7–40.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults20.1%17.6–22.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–6425.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)100.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate0.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population24.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age21.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 1.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.88 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured