Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38950

in Philipp, MississippiPopulation 717

21.05/ 100

Ranked #31,806 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 0.9%)

Ranked #402 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 1.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

11.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

9.0%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

14.7%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

41.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

27.1%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

34.2%

in the top 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

17.9%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

61.1%

in the top 0.09% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

41.1%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

13.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Philipp, Mississippi (ZIP 38950) ranks in the bottom 0.9% nationally (31,806th) and the bottom 1.0% of Mississippi (402nd).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled self-care disability sits in the top 0.2% nationally, and stroke rests in the top 0.08% nationally. Modeled vision disability is in the top 0.6% nationally, and tooth loss stands in the top 0.4% nationally. Modeled diabetes settles in the top 0.2% nationally, mobility disability lies in the top 0.09% nationally, and independent living disability resides in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lands in the top 0.09% nationally, fair or poor health registers in the top 0.5% nationally, and coronary heart disease sits in the top 0.4% nationally.

For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 38920, just across the boundary. Modeled tooth loss sits in the top 0.4% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 54%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 1%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 46%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 6%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.5%36.5–44.4
High blood pressure among adults61.1%56.9–65.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.8–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults13.8%12.3–15.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults16.7%14.7–19.0
Depression among adults19.2%16.2–22.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults27.1%24.0–30.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.8%41.3–50.6
Obesity among adults49.1%41.3–57.3
Stroke among adults9.0%8.1–9.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years41.8%36.5–47.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.4%13.3–20.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.2%83.0–87.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.1%81.3–86.7
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.5–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.7%52.7–62.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults5.1%4.3–6.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.7%61.2–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.6%7.9–11.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults27.6%24.1–31.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults50.9%45.1–56.8
Short sleep duration among adults42.0%35.6–48.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults41.1%36.8–45.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%16.9–21.4
Frequent physical distress among adults22.3%19.7–25.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.3%20.6–26.2
Any disability among adults52.6%47.3–57.7
Hearing disability among adults13.0%11.6–14.5
Independent living disability among adults17.9%15.9–20.1
Mobility disability among adults34.2%30.7–37.9
Self-care disability among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
Vision disability among adults14.7%13.1–16.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.7%29.2–38.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults40.8%35.9–45.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults33.4%29.0–37.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.2%23.7–30.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults20.4%17.8–22.9
Loneliness among adults37.6%32.2–42.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults21.4%18.6–23.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate37.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6421.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)12.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)13.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription74.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)7.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households36.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age29.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$49,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.7 yr ± 2.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.16 years of 73.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured