Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38680

in Walls, MississippiPopulation 6,839

48.39/ 100

Ranked #18,434 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 43%)

Ranked #64 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranked #27 of 81 Memphis, TN-MS-AR ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lithium in drinking water

9.6 µg/L

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

36.9 per million

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.15 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

37.3%

in the top 13.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.7%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

6.5%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

35.6%

in the top 28% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US72nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Walls, Mississippi (ZIP 38680) sits in the bottom 43% nationally (18,434th) and the top 16% of Mississippi (64th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: lithium in drinking water sits in the bottom 4.6% nationally, and elder services registers in the top 9.9% nationally. Working the other way, modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 5.4% nationally, air-toxics cancer risk resides in the top 8.3% nationally, and loneliness lies in the top 10.9% nationally. Floodplain exposure settles in the top 12.9% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the top 13.6% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity is in the top 14.6% nationally, and humid heat rests in the top 15% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure sits in the top 15% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. ZIP 38651, about 1.0 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Memphis, TN-MS-AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.9%22.9–29.2
High blood pressure among adults40.3%36.1–44.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.7%5.1–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.7%5.9–7.6
Depression among adults20.2%17.1–23.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.2–14.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.9%31.8–40.0
Obesity among adults38.8%32.2–45.9
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.5%10.9–16.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.5%9.8–13.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%74.1–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.4%77.0–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.2–87.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%56.9–67.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults10.4%8.8–12.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.7%66.4–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.0%12.3–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.5%13.4–18.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.1%25.7–34.8
Short sleep duration among adults39.7%33.7–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.8%19.1–24.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.6%15.6–19.9
Frequent physical distress among adults13.3%11.7–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.1%15.1–19.3
Any disability among adults34.9%30.5–39.3
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.7–7.3
Independent living disability among adults9.1%8.1–10.2
Mobility disability among adults15.4%13.5–17.5
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.8%5.3–6.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.9%26.1–33.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.9%18.3–23.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.8–13.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.8–19.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.8–12.5
Loneliness among adults37.4%32.5–42.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.3–12.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6413.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)15.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle2.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription91.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)37.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate68.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households36.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+11.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age39.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$59,503$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$220,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$1,295$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.7 yr ± 0.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 76.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured