Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

33534

in Gibsonton, FloridaPopulation 17,740

46.12/ 100

Ranked #21,210 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #709 of 974 Florida ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #109 of 133 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

88.8%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

188.1 days/year

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

21%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

57.2%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.1%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.4%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

96.9%

in the top 10.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Combined exposures in this ZIP

More than one environmental exposure stands out in this ZIP. Each is established independently and shown on its own above; they are grouped here for context — not because one causes the other.

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Gibsonton, Florida (ZIP 33534) sits in the bottom 34% nationally (21,210th) and the bottom 27% of Florida (709th).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled pfas resides in the top 0.6% nationally, humid heat sits in the top 1.1% nationally, and uninsured stands in the top 3.9% nationally. PFOS in drinking water resides at the national maximum, modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 2.3% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands in the top 2.9% nationally. PFAS in drinking water resides at the national maximum, and modeled short sleep sits in the top 6.3% nationally. Modeled colon screening stands in the bottom 6.5% nationally. On the stronger side, home broadband subscription resides in the top 10.6% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 33578, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Disability

healthier than 43%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the bottom 1.0%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 49%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults20.1%17.9–22.4
High blood pressure among adults32.6%29.5–35.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.0–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.6%6.0–7.4
Depression among adults18.1%15.5–20.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.7–13.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.6%33.2–39.9
Obesity among adults34.8%29.9–39.9
Stroke among adults3.1%2.9–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.4%13.6–19.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years21.0%18.5–23.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure70.1%66.9–73.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults73.7%70.1–77.0
Cholesterol screening among adults81.9%79.8–84.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.4%51.7–60.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.5%44.2–50.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%68.8–81.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.3%14.6–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.8–17.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.4%23.9–31.1
Short sleep duration among adults43.1%38.3–47.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.1%20.6–25.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.4%17.4–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%13.1–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.1%15.3–18.9
Any disability among adults32.4%29.0–35.8
Hearing disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.3–15.5
Self-care disability among adults4.6%4.1–5.0
Vision disability among adults7.0%6.4–7.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36411.4% (5.3–23.2%) n=972
Uninsured 18–6421.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28615.9% (7.1–27.2%) n=968
No HS diploma (25+)17.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.7% (2.9–20.6%) n=977
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50529.1% (12.7–56.0%) n=977
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (1.8–7.7%) n=968
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (1.2–11.0%) n=972
Broadband subscription96.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.9% (83.2–96.9%) n=972
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32233.2% (20.1–47.6%) n=972
Homeownership rate66.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32274.9% (47.3–90.5%) n=972
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.2% (0.2–6.7%) n=972
Foreign-born population14.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55311.5% (2.3–39.9%) n=977
Single-parent households40.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.8% (38.7–75.3%) n=968
Population 65+8.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.4% (11.9–40.6%) n=977
Median age34.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.0 yr (35.1–59.8) n=972
Median household income$80,484$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$72,857 ($48,246–$112,420) n=946
Median home value$314,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$334,600 ($168,120–$631,410) n=932
Median gross rent$1,452$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,604 ($968–$2,218) n=901
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)FL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured