Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

62618

in Beardstown, IllinoisPopulation 7,428

45.42/ 100

Ranked #21,966 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranked #1,115 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

45%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.26 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

57.2%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

15.8%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

93.2%

in the top 12.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

17.6%

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

22.2%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Beardstown, Illinois (ZIP 62618), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 31% nationally (21,966th) and the bottom 18% of Illinois (1,115th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: lead in tap water lands at the national minimum, elder services is in the top 5.4% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband lies in the top 12.4% nationally. By contrast, floodplain exposure sits in the top 5.0% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled colon screening registers in the bottom 7.8% nationally, and uninsured stands in the top 9.6% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the top 13.1% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 62378, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 52%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 18%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.2 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $65,208 predicts 78.4 years — 2.2 years below.

    Ranked #2,904 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.4%22.2–28.7
High blood pressure among adults34.9%30.6–39.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.1%6.3–7.8
Current asthma among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.8%6.9–8.8
Depression among adults21.3%17.8–25.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.0–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.3%30.8–39.9
Obesity among adults41.9%32.8–51.1
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.1%12.4–15.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.8%13.6–18.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.4%70.0–76.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.9%71.6–79.8
Cholesterol screening among adults84.0%81.9–86.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.2%54.3–60.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.4%53.8–59.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.2%65.5–74.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%14.3–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%13.8–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.1%24.3–34.1
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%34.2–41.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.0%21.0–27.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.8–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults14.9%13.1–16.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.0%14.0–17.9
Any disability among adults33.3%28.8–38.0
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Independent living disability among adults9.6%8.5–10.7
Mobility disability among adults15.3%13.3–17.4
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–4.9
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.8–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.8%23.8–32.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.2%19.2–25.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.1%17.3–23.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.6%15.3–20.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.4–12.1
Loneliness among adults35.3%29.9–40.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.1–12.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6413.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)18.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription83.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate71.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population23.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households41.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+13.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age36.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$65,208$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$89,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$752$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured