Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37026

in Bradyville, TennesseePopulation 2,054

40.09/ 100

Ranked #26,694 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #333 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranked #101 of 110 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN ZIPs (bottom 8.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.3%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST78th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

59.5 mi

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

43.3%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

69.2%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.41%

in the bottom 13.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$43,005

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST10th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Bradyville, Tennessee (ZIP 37026), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 17% nationally (26,694th) and the bottom 46% of Tennessee (333rd).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: fatal road crashes settles at the national minimum, fiber broadband lands in the top 4.1% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site rests in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise settles at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise lands in the bottom 13.9% nationally. On the other hand, modeled obesity rests in the top 8.0% nationally, and cognitive disability settles in the top 11.6% nationally. Modeled mammography lands in the bottom 11.0% nationally, and household income rests in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Recreation settles at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, for reference, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 37018, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 19%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 24%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 83%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 31%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 79.7; chronic-disease standing 22.8 — 57 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #1,959 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.9%30.4–37.7
High blood pressure among adults41.0%36.7–45.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.1–9.9
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.6%9.2–12.1
Depression among adults30.9%26.6–35.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.3%12.4–16.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.6%36.2–45.2
Obesity among adults43.3%34.9–52.1
Stroke among adults4.0%3.7–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.3%15.0–22.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.0%9.8–14.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.5%73.3–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.3%73.4–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%83.8–87.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.5%56.0–66.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.9%51.8–59.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.2%59.8–77.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%11.8–17.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.1%18.0–24.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.8%24.1–34.0
Short sleep duration among adults39.8%32.5–46.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.0%21.8–28.7
Frequent mental distress among adults20.8%18.5–23.4
Frequent physical distress among adults17.1%15.1–19.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%17.1–22.1
Any disability among adults38.9%34.2–44.1
Hearing disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.3–12.2
Mobility disability among adults18.3%15.8–21.0
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.2–5.4
Vision disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6414.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)15.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)5.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle7.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription85.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate86.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households67.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+28.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age42.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$43,005$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$209,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$934$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.7 yr ± 0.8278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.82 years of 73.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured