Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38483

in Summertown, TennesseePopulation 7,610

40.58/ 100

Ranked #26,339 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #316 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.62%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.49 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

6.1%

in the top 10.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.27%

in the top 32% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US68th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Summertown, Tennessee (ZIP 38483) lands in the bottom 18% nationally (26,339th) and the bottom 49% of Tennessee (316th).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 3.6% nationally, and outpatient lands in the top 8.1% nationally. Modeled tree cover sits in the top 19% nationally. On the other side, modeled nitrate is in the top 7.1% nationally, crowded housing settles in the top 10.4% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability resides in the top 13.5% nationally. Physicians registers at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss rests in the top 19% nationally, short sleep stands in the top 19% nationally, and humid heat lies in the top 20% nationally.

A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 38461, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 28%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 66%

21%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.0%30.2–35.8
High blood pressure among adults40.4%37.0–43.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.2–9.7
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Depression among adults31.6%28.2–35.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%12.3–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.3%36.9–43.9
Obesity among adults40.0%33.9–46.1
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.1%12.9–17.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.8%9.8–14.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.2%73.8–78.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.7%73.6–79.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.7–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.3%57.1–65.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.2%50.7–57.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%66.1–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%13.0–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.6%18.0–23.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.1%24.4–32.2
Short sleep duration among adults39.8%34.4–45.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.4%21.6–27.4
Frequent mental distress among adults20.8%18.8–22.9
Frequent physical distress among adults16.8%15.1–18.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.1%17.0–21.3
Any disability among adults37.5%33.6–41.5
Hearing disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Independent living disability among adults10.3%9.2–11.5
Mobility disability among adults17.6%15.7–19.8
Self-care disability among adults4.4%4.0–5.0
Vision disability among adults5.7%5.1–6.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6417.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)17.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle6.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription89.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate81.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population1.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households49.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+14.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age33.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$61,293$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$219,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$747$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.4 yr ± 1.0478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.04 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured