Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37046

in College Grove, TennesseePopulation 7,310

59.03/ 100

Ranked #5,571 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 17%)

Ranked #24 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 3.9%)

Ranked #13 of 110 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN ZIPs (top 11.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$178,228

in the top 1.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.3%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

1.6%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.17 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

7.3%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.4%

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

2.8%

in the bottom 12.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

3.5%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, College Grove, Tennessee (ZIP 37046) ranks in the top 17% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,571st) and the top 3.9% of Tennessee (24th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: household income lands in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled arsenic registers in the bottom 7.2% nationally. Households without a vehicle sits at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Elder services rests in the top 8.8% nationally, modeled energy burden is in the bottom 6.5% nationally, and grocery stands in the top 9.7% nationally. Modeled tooth loss settles in the bottom 9.6% nationally, and independent living disability lies in the bottom 13.3% nationally. Against that, slow internet speeds resides in the top 8.9% nationally, and fatal road crashes lands in the top 14.6% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 37067, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 87%

11%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 96%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 96%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 94%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.1%27.6–34.8
High blood pressure among adults38.6%34.4–42.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.2–6.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.3%5.1–7.7
Depression among adults25.6%22.1–29.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.7–13.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.6%36.2–45.0
Obesity among adults31.5%25.4–38.1
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.3%5.8–8.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.5%5.0–8.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.4%75.1–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%76.5–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults90.9%89.3–92.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.1%62.0–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.6%67.3–73.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.2%69.9–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.8–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%9.1–14.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults19.2%15.3–23.6
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%28.4–40.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.7%13.0–18.8
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.3–17.7
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.4–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.4%10.4–14.6
Any disability among adults27.6%23.5–32.3
Hearing disability among adults6.7%5.8–7.7
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.3–7.6
Mobility disability among adults12.2%10.1–14.6
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.4–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.5%3.0–4.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6410.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)1.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)63.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription94.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate87.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households47.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age41.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$178,228$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$979,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$3,501$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.2 yr ± 1.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.16 years of 80.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured