Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37355

in Manchester, TennesseePopulation 29,805

41.01/ 100

Ranked #26,017 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #301 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

70.3%

in the top 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

70.3%

in the top 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Manchester, Tennessee (ZIP 37355), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 19% nationally (26,017th) and the top 49% of Tennessee (301st).

continue reading

The profile opens balanced, with readings on either hand: distance to an emergency room resides at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing rests in the top 11.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lies at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Mental-health providers sits in the top 15.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the top 16% nationally. By contrast, modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 5.2% nationally, and cognitive disability stands in the top 13.0% nationally. PFOA in drinking water lands in the top 13.5% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water is in the top 14.3% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility resides at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

Held up against its neighbors, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 37018, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 60%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 40%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 0.9 years. A median household income of $63,357 predicts 78.3 years — 3.9 years below.

    Ranked #4,992 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.2%29.9–36.8
High blood pressure among adults41.8%37.8–46.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.2–9.9
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.3%9.3–11.4
Depression among adults30.1%26.2–34.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.1%12.4–16.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.8%36.6–45.2
Obesity among adults39.6%32.6–47.3
Stroke among adults4.1%3.8–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.8%13.8–20.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.7%10.9–14.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.8%74.1–79.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.6%74.0–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%84.1–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.7%55.4–66.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.8%51.1–58.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.9%63.7–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.2–18.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.3%17.9–23.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.7%24.7–33.3
Short sleep duration among adults39.1%32.6–46.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.1%22.4–28.1
Frequent mental distress among adults20.3%18.2–22.6
Frequent physical distress among adults16.8%15.0–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.2%17.3–21.4
Any disability among adults39.1%34.9–43.7
Hearing disability among adults9.0%8.0–10.0
Independent living disability among adults10.7%9.7–11.8
Mobility disability among adults18.3%16.2–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Vision disability among adults6.1%5.6–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate16.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6415.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)12.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle2.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription85.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate69.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population4.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households51.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+16.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age37.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$63,357$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$255,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$955$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 0.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.45 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured