Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37037

in Christiana, TennesseePopulation 9,855

53.71/ 100

Ranked #11,078 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 35%)

Ranked #52 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 8.5%)

Ranked #26 of 110 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.0%

in the bottom 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.6%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Crowded housing

5.7%

in the top 11.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes with more than one person per room, the Census definition of crowded housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

48 mi

in the top 13.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.9%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

95.5%

in the top 17% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

44.5%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

2.9%

in the bottom 14.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

11.7%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Christiana, Tennessee (ZIP 37037) lands in the top 35% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,078th) and the top 8.5% of Tennessee (52nd).

continue reading

This area's strengths are easy to pick out across the measures: modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 7.7% nationally, coronary heart disease lands in the bottom 9.7% nationally, and stroke lies in the bottom 8.3% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 13.4% nationally, modeled hearing disability rests in the bottom 15% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers in the top 17% nationally. Modeled energy burden resides in the bottom 16% nationally, and fiber broadband settles in the top 17% nationally. Working the other way, crowded housing is in the top 11.5% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 11.8% nationally.

Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. On the overall standing, ZIP 37128, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Disability

healthier than 93%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.8 ± 1.9 years. A median household income of $102,645 predicts 80.2 years — 3.4 years below.

    Ranked #4,607 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.4%24.3–30.5
High blood pressure among adults33.7%29.9–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.4–7.0
Depression among adults27.4%23.8–31.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%8.8–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%31.5–39.6
Obesity among adults36.8%30.7–43.3
Stroke among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.4%10.0–15.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%7.9–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.6%69.2–75.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.2%72.6–79.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.8–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.4%58.4–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.0%58.3–65.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%71.3–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.3–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.0%12.9–17.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.8%17.6–24.5
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%31.0–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.5%14.4–18.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%16.9–21.2
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.1–14.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.4%13.6–17.3
Any disability among adults29.4%25.7–33.3
Hearing disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.6
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.3–8.0
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.2–13.3
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.6–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6412.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)9.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription95.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate87.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households46.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+11.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age37.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$102,645$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$391,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$2,058$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.1 yr (72.6–78.1) n=587

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured